What I quoted was not mere opinion, as you would like to dismiss it as.
What I quoted is what we call "peer review".
1069 posed a hypothesis, it was independently tested by both PL and PC, and it was found to be in error.
That, CoffieSaint, is what my post proved.
That legal theory is dead.
If you can inject some case law and adjust that legal theory to account for new information then it may be worth revisiting. Until then, however, it is no more worthy of mention than the flat-earth theory.