• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Can you legally Amend the Bill of Rights?

Can the Bill of Rights be legally amended with other Amendments?

  • YES - anything in the Constitution is subject to the Amendment process.

    Votes: 37 86.0%

  • NO - you cannot amend anything which changes any provision in the Bill of Rights

    Votes: 6 14.0%
  • Total voters
    43
  • Poll closed .
the link provided shows the COPY of the federal bill of rights, for the state of Delaware.

it clearly states that the clauses of the bill of rights are declaratory or restrictive.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS

the link provided shows the COPY of the federal bill of rights, for the state of Texas.

it clearly states that the clauses of the bill of rights are declaratory or restrictive.

texas picture copy of the federal bill of rights - Bing Images

the link provided shows the COPY of the federal bill of rights, for the state of Rhode Island.

it clearly states that the clauses of the bill of rights are declaratory or restrictive.

http://www.revolutionary-war-and-be...elve-amendments-to-the-constitution-large.jpg

other states copies of the federal bill of rights can be found on line, and they state the clauses are declaratory and restrictive clauses also.

court is adjourned.............Madison ..master of the bill of rights.
 
Last edited:
ernst barkmann said:
lol, you cant win, Madison has won, and now your claiming dishonestly.

now you gone even lower....case is closed!
Click to expand...

Madison has NO POWER to add things to the US Constitution.

The document you linked to from Delaware shows 12 amendments in the Bill of Rights plus the Preamble. :shock::doh Obviously - there are NOT 12 amendments in the Bill of Rights nor a preamble. Can you count?

It is fairly obvious that you do not even read what you post.

You have provided no evidence that the needed minimum states ever ratified the Preamble to the US Constitution to make it an official part of the US Constitution. The actions of one state are irrelevant and no not constitute the needed number for ratification.

You have been given many many many opportunities to do so. And you have been impotent to do so. By this point, you are now simply lying about it and engaging in an intentional and purposeful fraud to try and deceive others to advance your own political or ideological agenda.

That is disgusting
 
Last edited:
ernst barkmann said:
the link provided shows the COPY of the federal bill of rights, for the state of Delaware.

it clearly states that the clauses of the bill of rights are declaratory or restrictive.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS

the link provided shows the COPY of the federal bill of rights, for the state of Rhode Island.

it clearly states that the clauses of the bill of rights are declaratory or restrictive.

http://www.revolutionary-war-and-be...elve-amendments-to-the-constitution-large.jpg

other states copies of the federal bill of rights can be found on line, and they state the clauses are declaratory and restrictive clauses also.

court is adjourned.............Madison ..master of the bill of rights.
Click to expand...
Isn't it interesting that both these pictures contain all 12 proposed amendments yet Delaware rejected Article I and Rhode Island rejected Article II? Obviously, these aren't the documents that were ratified by those states, they're just the copies the respective States received from the Fed. Sorry, your evidence is obviously irrelevant.


court is adjourned ... you lost your case.
 
MoSurveyor said:
Isn't it interesting that both these pictures contain all 12 proposed amendments yet Delaware rejected Article I and Rhode Island rejected Article II? Obviously, these aren't the documents that were ratified by those states, they're just the copies the respective States received from the Fed. Sorry, your evidence is obviously irrelevant.


court is adjourned ... you lost your case.
Click to expand...

Like the rape trial against the 93 year old - the evidence failed to stand up in court. ;)
 
MoSurveyor said:
Isn't it interesting that both these pictures contain all 12 proposed amendments yet Delaware rejected Article I and Rhode Island rejected Article II? Obviously, these aren't the documents that were ratified by those states, they're just the copies the respective States received from the Fed. Sorry, your evidence is obviously irrelevant.


court is adjourned ... you lost your case.
Click to expand...


Madison case is strong and decisive, sorry you cant live with the truth and choose to remain in denial..........via con dios
 
ernst barkmann said:
Madison case is strong and decisive, sorry you cant live with the truth and choose to remain in denial.......via con dios
Click to expand...

In case you never knew this - James Madison has no power to amend the US Constitution.

Are we clear on that?

Do you now understand that?

go and read Article V which discusses Amendments. Your boy Madison is never mentioned once.
 
ernst barkmann said:
Madison case is strong and decisive, sorry you cant live with the truth and choose to remain in denial..........via con dios
Click to expand...
Too bad you can't produce evidence for your claims, though I shouldn't be surprised by it. You've kind of established that as your modus operandi.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom