- Joined
- Aug 26, 2012
- Messages
- 8,247
- Reaction score
- 2,713
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I can see what you wrote.
Now I am asking you a question based on what you wrote.
So you believe proposing the death penalty for a non capital crime in which no persons life was taken or even harmed and then failing to demonstrate that it is indeed a national problem which requires such a drastic and severe sanction is perfectly rational and stands as an idea without any further documentation?
My opinion is yes, I think it's possible to consider the punishment for an act based on the act itself, independent of the frequency with which the act may or may not be committed.