No, I don't understand a self defense issue where the officer has a gun point at him being compared to a national security issue where no one has a gun pointed at anyone.Do you really not understand the comparison? In both instances, we have an American citizen who poses an immediate and credible threat to the safety of other Americans, a citizen who refuses to surrender to the proper authorities.
So if a guy has a gun, it's okay to kill him to save Americans, but if the guy is actively engaging in warfare against Americans, arming those who would do harm against us with explosives, then we should politely ask him to stop?No, I don't understand a self defense issue where the officer has a gun point at him being compared to a national security issue where no one has a gun pointed at anyone.
I'm sorry, but I find your logic to be rather strange.
"And in the end, we were all just humans, drunk on the idea that love, only love, could heal our brokenness."
If the government knows one of these turds is there, then due process could be a citizenship hearing to revoke citizenship prior to shooting. That would be due process enough for me.
Early voting in Georgia. On the 20th of October this old Goldwater conservative voted against both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton by casting my vote for Gary Johnson. Neither Trump or Clinton belong within a million miles of the Oval Office.