• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What should obama do to deal with the IRS And AP scandels

what should obama do

  • option 1

    Votes: 11 91.7%

  • option 2

    Votes: 7 58.3%

  • option 3

    Votes: 7 58.3%

  • option 4

    Votes: 6 50.0%
  • Total voters
    12
Unitedwestand13 said:
1: allow investigations of who at the irs and DOJ was responsible.

2: replace leadership at DOJ and IRS.

3: demand rsignation of Eric holder for his lack of leadership.

4: force justice department to reveal information by executive order.
Click to expand...
5: Order a special presidential election to occur within 12 months and resign his entire cabinet and administration with the election of a new President. In the mean time, pass executive orders nullifying the Patriot Act and Obama Care, pay TARP back to the people, eliminate all Federal gun control law, establish federal protection for pre-viable abortion and many kinds of marriage, close the borders and establish devastating penalties for businesses who employ illegal, and everything else Conservative.

In short, Obama should politically invert and self district. Dissolving the Democrat party and deporting socialists would be a good fare well gift as well.
 
VanceMack said:
Why should Obama do ANYTHING about any of this? What makes this any worse than any of the last several incidents? Besides...its not like he knows anything about anything that goes on in any of the agencies under his administration. Its not his fault. He didnt know. No one told him. The sun was in his eyes. The dog ate his briefs.
Click to expand...

I agree.

The mainstream media seems intent on giving him yet another pass and there is no real reason that preferential treatment is going to stop anytime soon. There is no real sense in him doing anything of these latest scandals are going to get the same attention given to the Kermit Gosnell trial. CNN and MSNBC certainly aren't given these stories anywhere near the same attention as Angelina Jolie's mastectomy and the only thing the New York Times is willing to say about them is how, one way or the other, Pres. Obama is completely blameless in it all.
 
Dapper Andy said:
I agree.

The mainstream media seems intent on giving him yet another pass and there is no real reason that preferential treatment is going to stop anytime soon. There is no real sense in him doing anything of these latest scandals are going to get the same attention given to the Kermit Gosnell trial. CNN and MSNBC certainly aren't given these stories anywhere near the same attention as Angelina Jolie's mastectomy and the only thing the New York Times is willing to say about them is how, one way or the other, Pres. Obama is completely blameless in it all.
Click to expand...

So, is Angelina Jolie without breast as ugly as the Obama regime?
 
In fact if all liberals could just kill themselves right now, that'd be great.

Seriously, kill yourself. I'm not joking. You are the plague of human existence. You need to stop breathing right now. We could actually solve problems if liberals would stop getting in the way.
 
DVSentinel said:
So, is Angelina Jolie without breast as ugly as the Obama regime?
Click to expand...

There's no reason to make light of a woman highly at risk for breast cancer undergoing a double mastectomy but the coverage her titties are getting tonight in lieu of actual issues is a pretty good indication of the media's unwillingness to print or broadcast something negative about Pres. Obama. We knew that though and Pres. Obama knew it so there's no real reason for him to really do anything. He's protected. That is what it comes down to.
 
Dapper Andy said:
There's no reason to make light of a woman highly at risk for breast cancer undergoing a double mastectomy but the coverage her titties are getting tonight in lieu of actual issues is a pretty good indication of the media's unwillingness to print or broadcast something negative about Pres. Obama. We knew that though and Pres. Obama knew it so there's no real reason for him to really do anything. He's protected. That is what it comes down to.
Click to expand...

I'm at high risk for lung cancer, should I go have my lungs cut out?

But then again, with the way things have been going with the government, I am also at high risk of dying due to revolting against a revolting government. Hmmm. Removing Obama from office might help reduce, but not actually eliminate that risk. What the hell, lets try it as a preventative health measure.
 
Wheres all of the above?
 
Jerry said:
Breast cancer isn't a joking mater.
Click to expand...

I agree, although I don't quite understand you motivation or logic for saying it here. The joke was about a political person and a public person who disfigured herself out of fear. The fact that breast cancer is what she feared really has nothing to do with it. Had she actually had breast cancer and the procedure was indeed necessary to save her life, that would be one thing, but what I have gleaned from statements made and headlines, she did not act out of necessity but out of fear.
 
Give a speech about "Hope and Change" and get elected again.

I seem to recall his criticism of Bush's lack of transparency and praise of whistleblowers before spending the next 5 years going after whistle blowers and creating the most non-transparent presidency since Nixon. It's amazing how identical "Hope and Change" has been to Bush. People only hear speeches though, so.....give a speech.
 
DVSentinel said:
I agree, although I don't quite understand you motivation or logic for saying it here. The joke was about a political person and a public person who disfigured herself out of fear. The fact that breast cancer is what she feared really has nothing to do with it. Had she actually had breast cancer and the procedure was indeed necessary to save her life, that would be one thing, but what I have gleaned from statements made and headlines, she did not act out of necessity but out of fear.
Click to expand...

You haven't gleaned enough. There was only a 13% chance Jolie wouldn't develop breast cancer. There is only a 50/50 chance that she won't develop the same ovarian cancer her mother did (because of the same "faulty" gene), so she's having her ovaries removed too.

If you don't have the facts, don't sit in judgment. In fact, even if you do, don't.
 
nota bene said:
If you don't have the facts, don't sit in judgment. In fact, even if you do, don't.
Click to expand...

I wonder if people tell judges not to judge. It must drive their wives/husbands crazy.
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
1: allow investigations of who at the irs and DOJ was responsible.

2: replace leadership at DOJ and IRS.

3: demand rsignation of Eric holder for his lack of leadership.

4: force justice department to reveal information by executive order.
Click to expand...

5. Continue to lie about it and weasel a lot.
 
nota bene said:
You haven't gleaned enough. There was only a 13% chance Jolie wouldn't develop breast cancer. There is only a 50/50 chance that she won't develop the same ovarian cancer her mother did (because of the same "faulty" gene), so she's having her ovaries removed too.

If you don't have the facts, don't sit in judgment. In fact, even if you do, don't.
Click to expand...

13% against not developing is not the same as 100% of will develop. Sorry, cannot support preventative disfigurement. Now the ovary thing, no problem, she is a liberal, so she should never be allowed to use them. Kind of like the abortion of human fetuses, shouldn't be allowed, but of liberal fetuses, it should be mandated.

Hmm, genetic defect in a liberal, coincidence?
 
Resign
 
Unitedwestand13 said:
1: allow investigations of who at the irs and DOJ was responsible.

2: replace leadership at DOJ and IRS.

3: demand rsignation of Eric holder for his lack of leadership.

4: force justice department to reveal information by executive order.
Click to expand...

I'd go for number one if it was an independent council, I never trust people to investigate themselves or members of one political party to investigate the other party. Number 4 would be an excellent start. As far as i am concerned, no resignations are needed at this point. Let the investigations by special council determine the facts of which all of us are jumping at conclusions when we know really very little.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom