• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

How long till Same Sex Marriage is nationally legal in the US?

How long till Same Sex Marriage is nationally legal in the US?


  • Total voters
    105
We are not talking Jehovah's witnesses here..we are talking about a fundamental belief in the bible..

I don't see how this is relevant to what I just said.
 
If I was a Christian..which I am not..I would feel that the teachings of the bible..''Man shall not lie down with man'' had been ignored..and now they accept this...

It is not about marriage..it is about shooting everyone's beliefs out of the water...[/QUOTE

Even though I consider myself a christian, in this regard, I don't follow the teachings of the Bible. Unions and marriages should have the same rights and responsibilities. IMO, that's fair, that's OK.

Attempting to maintain that unions and marriages are the same is not fair. It's socialism. It's ideology. Certainly anti-religious.
 
1.) thats easy it is indeed factually false, separate but equal is a fallacy. AGain are you from america? are you familiar with our history, rights, laws, liberties and freedoms. Dont play dumb.
2.) no i said they arent equal or i meant to say they arent equal if i made a type-o
3.) no you said you could name 50 off the top of your head easy, as you just proved you cant not

you started naming states they dont have separate but equal marriages they all have marriage and the states are allowed to slightly tweak them ALL OF THEM TOGETHER

weird you didnt quote my last post to you

What is factually false.??????
 
Nothing is being overturned???

Look again AgentJ...I think it is..

biblical quotes are factually not being overturned, think what you want you are 100% wrong

the bible has nothing to do with legal marriage
 
What is factually false.??????

read 1 over again LOL
separate but equal is not equal that is factually false.

and thats what i thought about your examples i asked you to provide and then the 50 cases. Your dodge in noted AGAIN.
 
biblical quotes are factually not being overturned, think what you want you are 100% wrong

the bible has nothing to do with legal marriage

It has everything to do with Christian belief though...doesn't it??
 
It has everything to do with Christian belief though...doesn't it??

nope not one bit, legal marriage has nothing to do with christian belief.

Legal marriage isnt needed to be religiously married
 
biblical quotes are factually not being overturned, think what you want you are 100% wrong

the bible has nothing to do with legal marriage

But has everything to do with religious marriage which is what marriage was before the gov't got ahold of it. I'm thinking there were some religious first amendment violations there. The gov't changed a religion - changed marriage. And is trying to do it again with gay marriage.

J, do you know what concepts are? I ask, because you think very concretely. Are you in high school?
 
Last edited:
nope not one bit, legal marriage has nothing to do with christian belief.

Legal marriage isnt needed to be religiously married

Then tell me why?? Gay people want to get married in a church..
 
Then tell me why?? Gay people want to get married in a church..

That is between them and their church. There is no move to force churches to perform gay marriages as that would be infringing on the barrier between church and state.
 
But has everything to do with religious marrige which is what marriage was before the gov't got ahold of it. I'm thinking there were some religious first amendment violations there. The gov't changed a religion - changed marriage. And is trying to do it again.

and again you think wrong

religious marriage is factually not impacted one bit, it remains the same
there are ZERO amendment violations, government did not change religion at all one single bit
 
But has everything to do with religious marrige which is what marriage was before the gov't got ahold of it. I'm thinking there were some religious first amendment violations there. The gov't changed a religion - changed marriage. And is trying to do it again.

It existed in civilizations before advent of Christ, marriage is older than Christianity . Nothing about religious marriage changes, you can still get religiously married, all legalizing gay marriage does is allow gays to get legally married not religiously married but if a church is willing to do it they can.
 
Then tell me why?? Gay people want to get married in a church..

see now i know you arent even being serious LMAO nobody would ask that question that is for real

because they want a RELIGIOUS marriage LMAO
 
That is between them and their church. There is no move to force churches to perform gay marriages as that would be infringing on the barrier between church and state.

But if they are true Christians..surely they are aware that homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of God..

Why do they want to get married in a church??

I would feel horribly uneasy..
 
But if they are true Christians..surely they are aware that homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of God..

So is eating shell fish, wearing blended fabrics, etc.....
 
But if they are true Christians..surely they are aware that homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of God..

Why do they want to get married in a church??

I would feel horribly uneasy..

I am not Christian and wouldn't be able to give them advice on that. The best I can say is that there are numerous Christians who are gay, and who do not believe that homosexuality or gay marriage are abominations. Either way, I consider this to be an in-house issue, so to speak, and really isn't any of my business.
 
1.)But if they are true Christians..surely they are aware that homosexuality is an abomination in the eyes of God..

2.) Why do they want to get married in a church??

I would feel horribly uneasy..

1.) nope thats just the opinion of some, many Christians are ok with SSM, churches too
2.) they want a religious wedding
3.) your uneasiness is meaningless to somebody else wedding, would you care if your wedding made your neighbor uneasy?
 
I am not Christian and wouldn't be able to give them advice on that. The best I can say is that there are numerous Christians who are gay, and who do not believe that homosexuality or gay marriage are abominations. Either way, I consider this to be an in-house issue, so to speak, and really isn't any of my business.

It is not really any of my business either..but I can imagine why Christians are outraged!!
 
I think you are talking about the Torah...

My understanding is that the same part of the bible (Leviticus) which is often quoted when condemning homosexuality is
a)also the same section that condemns a large number of practices that is widely considered obsolete today and
b)was overturned by Jesus in the new testament anyway.
 
It has everything to do with Christian belief though...doesn't it??

No, gay advocates are trying to have gays seen in exactly the same light as non-gays. That is not a civil right. I should ask J why he's violating my civil rights because he doesn't like my stance on gay marriage (doesn't see me in the same light as everybody else).
 
Back
Top Bottom