- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,325
- Reaction score
- 311
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Perhaps it's just your phrasing. A more appropriate response would have been "if consenting adults understand the legal implications and don't break our laws.." rather than "if consenting adults understand the situation and we rewrite the tax law to prevent hiding taxes.." it would sound more responsible and shows that you care about your country. But you didn't say that. Your response simply flaunts your liberalism. In essence, you're saying "Will enough taxes be taken from this household? Does the IRS have all the information it needs on this household? Is there anything I can do to ensure that these people are paying their fair share? Will the doctrines of Socialism have a secure enough foothold on this place?".Perhaps if you had any knowledge of tax shelters, you wouldn't be making asinine statements like that? You argue from positions of ignorance all the time. This is one of them.
Government subsidized condoms is proof.11-12 year olds are not mature enough for sex. But that doesn't mean they don't do it. That alone is not proof of maturity for consent.
What Works - Condom availability programs