1.) yeah im fine with no license just typical stuff that needs done for a contract
Basically, the person officiating the wedding signs the marriage certificate, then it's recognized. I see that as the simplest way to go about it.
2.) but again since you want to rid the system of a contract that deems two people one, that lady "potentially" still loses her house.
sorry just seems like a hard way to achieve something less effective and secure
I think we have a misunderstanding here. I don't want to rid the marriage contract system, just get government out of the regulation of it. Basically stripping all levels of government from having the right to not legally recognize a marriage but rather compelling them to do so, IOW the woman would keep her house because the government MUST recognize the marriage as legitimate, so she would have the first legal claim on the estate.
3.) good faith? no thanks that wouldnt work still to many people that dont care about you or me. Id rather keep the marriage the way it is, drop the license and treat people equally.
That is a good faith contract. Basically bad faith is when a contract is entered into for dishonest reasons, for marriage it could be anything from breaking vows(infidelity, abuse) to entering into the marriage for financial gain in a dishonest manner, like marrying just so the person will die and leave the estate to the spouse, but not having the other person's knowledge.
4.) But its already the case in general and when its made equal its dont. Why do it the long way?
IMO my way is the shortest, one simple sentence compels the government to legally recognize marriages, unless it's a child marriage or something else we all could agree is not acceptable, and by all I mean normative behavior; this would exclude pedophiles, bestiality, etc.
%.) i totally disagree without it being the same as it is now and the government just making it equal i dont see it being fixed at all. Its the only way to make the agendas meaningless.
That's the beauty of it, government is out except for benefits, they have no choice.
1 contract, no licenses, make it equal. Less red tape less people with their hands and loopholes all over it etc.
but just incase im misunderstanding tell me a quick outline
I'll simplify it, all marriages must be recognized equally. Same sex and heterosexual marriages either enjoy the same benefits or benefits are struck, and I would love to see the government try to strike benefits for that many couples, there would be an electoral beating like we've never seen in our lifetimes.
marriage is gone, everybody can equally enter into what ever excising contracts and new contracts they want (besides marriage) its on a good faith system and not regulated by government?
is that right?
Well, contracts are an individual right barring laws that restrict certain terms so it stands to reason that we strike the govenrment terms and go back to pure marriage contract between consenting individuals.