• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

GOP Benghazi hearings a partisan disgrace?

GOP Benghazi hearings a partisan disgrace?


  • Total voters
    72
actually they all had access to the same information. furthermore, the claims about Saddam's WMD programs pre-existed the Bush administration, and were part of the Clinton Administrations decision to change U.S. policy to that of regime change :).



I don't recall the mushroom clouds (i recall a lot about chem/bio and some about dirty bombs), but no, it wasn't pure B.S. Firstly because we found both uranium and chemical weapons in Iraq, and Secondly because it was the opinion of the IC that there were active production lines ongoing in Iraq at the time, protected by a significant (and previously successful) D&D campaign by a regime skilled in that technique. And not just our own IC, but that of our allies and even our not-so-allies.



I realize that's a handy bumper sticker. It merely lacks what Henry Kissinger used to call "the added benefit of being true".
A great post my friend
 
Ron Paul on the Benghazi Partisan Sideshow

'This big argument between Republicans and Democrats is almost like the distraction—“Don’t ever bring up the subject of why we were there, what we were doing, how we could have prevented it, and why our foreign policy is so deeply flawed.”…

Hopefully people will wake up and see that this big argument over Benghazi on who said what and who is guilty and who told a lie and who didn’t tell a lie has nothing to do with the real issue. The real issue is: We ought to mind our own business, come home and stay out of those areas, and we wouldn’t have problems like this.'


The Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity : Ron Paul on the Benghazi Partisan Sideshow

http://www.ronpaulchannel.com/video/missing-mark-benghazi/
 
Last edited:
actually they all had access to the same information. furthermore, the claims about Saddam's WMD programs pre-existed the Bush administration, and were part of the Clinton Administrations decision to change U.S. policy to that of regime change :).



I don't recall the mushroom clouds (i recall a lot about chem/bio and some about dirty bombs), but no, it wasn't pure B.S. Firstly because we found both uranium and chemical weapons in Iraq, and Secondly because it was the opinion of the IC that there were active production lines ongoing in Iraq at the time, protected by a significant (and previously successful) D&D campaign by a regime skilled in that technique. And not just our own IC, but that of our allies and even our not-so-allies.



I realize that's a handy bumper sticker. It merely lacks what Henry Kissinger used to call "the added benefit of being true".

A great post my friend

:roll:
CNN.com - Search for the 'smoking gun' - Jan. 10, 2003
Dr. Rice then said something that was ominous and made headlines around the world.

"The problem here is that there will always be some uncertainty about how quickly he can acquire nuclear weapons. But we don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."

Btw, here's another tidbit not discussed much on Fox News: no WMD of real significance or existing weapons programs were ever found.
 
there's no proof it was a lie, or at least not burden of proof. Nothings changed, and while i synthasize with your struggle, i'll let you into a secret. The gop, will be torn down if they keep pursuing this path. Currently, the benghazi scandal is hurting the gop more than the democratic party.

roflmao.
 
Actually A) we know that the administration lied, because we knew that they knew at the time that it wasn't a youtube video protest, but that it had been clear from the get-go that it was an organized assault by the local al-qaeda affiliate, and B) Bush didn't lie, he was wrong. He was joined in being wrong by Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, John Kerry, and virtually every major leader of the Democrat party from that time period and just before hand, as well as the Intelligence Community of every major western power, but he was still wrong.

It is amusing how the progressives keep coming back for more on wmds in Iraq.
 
Clinton, Kerry and all of us were hoodwinked by the lies comming out of the administration. After all, it was Bush, Cheney, Powell and Rice who went on TV warning us of mushroom clouds. Pure BS is what it was.

Bush lied, thousands died. And, you all whine over 4 dead in Libya.

ROFL........Here we go again:

Democrats, WMD's & The Iraq War - YouTube
 

When I want serious disscussion, I to often get lol'd. The only reason you chose not to respond seriously, is because you know that no substantial proof exists. This is a fact, and while much speculation exists, it is not satisfactory to the justice system or moral conviction standards.
 
Obama's only real fault on handling the Boston Bombers was that as usual, he hesitated as long as he could before accepting that they were terrorists.
 
:roll:
CNN.com - Search for the 'smoking gun' - Jan. 10, 2003


Btw, here's another tidbit not discussed much on Fox News: no WMD of real significance or existing weapons programs were ever found.

The expected large stockpiles were not found. However any objective person can work out that the UN sanctions against Iraq were failing and the regime fully intended to crank up wmd production again....once the heat was off.
 
I'm not sure about the hearings, but this thread is fast turning into a partisan disgrace.
 
The expected large stockpiles were not found. However any objective person can work out that the UN sanctions against Iraq were failing and the regime fully intended to crank up wmd production again....once the heat was off.
Saddam was a fool. He pretended to have WMD. We rammed cruise missles down his throat. It is what it is. My point is that there's always opportunity to witch hunt.

Carter wimping out as hostages were taken in Iraq; Reagan being senile when marines died in Beruit; Daddy Bush missing the significance of the whole Chinese revolution thing; Clinton probably getting head when our ship got hit; JR totally screwing the pouch on 911, Obama sleeping during the attacks at Benghazi. No one is perfect. No one tells the whole truth when SHTF. No one really cares.
 
And what's "the truth"? Please indulge me.

The truth is that Obama and his lemmings in the administration lied to the American people for two weeks about what occurred in Benghazi.
 
The truth is that Obama and his lemmings in the administration lied to the American people for two weeks about what occurred in Benghazi.

That's not much of a "cover up."
 
Back
Top Bottom