Or Smith's mother, I presume ... is that your round about way of saying you were presumptuous to declare she was not objective?I don't know,.:roll:I haven't spoken to Hillary lately
It's not silly at all, the facts are that President Bush didn't want an investigation. And if it weren't for the "Jersey Girls" there might never have been one. BTW, didn't President Bush and his Dick get interviewed in secret. We also learned about the famous August 6th PDB. Bin Laden determined to strike in US
The investigate we have today is a partisan one.
No, not at all. A person who has lost a child is typically emotional and subjective. What knowledge did she have to blame Hillary?Or Smith's mother, I presume ... is that your round about way of saying you were presumptuous to declare she was not objective?
No, not at all. A person who has lost a child is typically emotional and subjective. What knowledge did she have to blame Hillary?
You think she doesn't know any more than you do? That she hasn't been paying closer attention? The mother has already had her loss.
Conversely, do you think Hillary is being totally objective? That's she's been totally forthcoming? Hillary is trying to avoid a loss.
HILLARY CLINTON, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE: With all due respect, the fact is, we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they'd go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
TAPPER: What was your reaction to that?
SMITH: Well, that's what I want to know. Why did it happen? And she is in charge. Why couldn't she do something about it? I blame her.
TAPPER: You blame Secretary of State Clinton.
SMITH: Yes.
The Smith being interviewed by Jake Tapper is the mother of Sean Smith.
Good evening, bubba.:2wave:
Despite this thread's title, I suspect that Hillary is in more danger from Benghazi than is BHO.
Here is what followed:
TAPPER: Why?
SMITH: Because that's her department. She is supposed to be on top of it. Yet she claims she knows nothing. It wasn't told to her. Well, who is running the place?
Mother Of Slain Benghazi Victim Rips Hillary Clinton: "I Blame Her" | RealClearPolitics
Speaking of disbelief ... remember this picture of Hillary in her fit of pique ... notice anything?Right. That's true isn't it? Didn't that sound like disbelief?
Right. That's true isn't it? Didn't that sound like disbelief?
I assume you're referring to the hacked emails.
Assuming they are real: Those were sent a journalist (who used to work for Bill C) -- as in someone outside the administration -- to Hillary. That hardly qualifies as an Administration consensus on the nature of the attacks by September 12th.
I realize this is hard to grasp, but it takes more than 30 seconds to figure out why an isolated diplomatic mission, in a volatile nation, got attacked.
Nor are the consequences of the kerfuffle particularly dire. As a result of the attack, the US hasn't declared war on Libya. The nation's security was not compromised. It is not realistic to turn every consulate and diplomatic mission into a miniature fortress. The deaths of the diplomatic staff could not be reversed based on the Administration's subsequent public statements.
So, forgive me if I toss a little salt over my shoulder when I see all the haters in a high moral dudgeon over this.
I completely disagree. I like a lot of what Huckabee says, but this? No way.
Obama can't run for a third term and I highly doubt he'll be impeached over it.
Unfortunately that didn't happen.....as they started out with an Email from Hillary to the President of Libya on the 12th of Sept telling him they Knew Ansar al Shariah was involved in the attack. A week before Rice went on the Sunday talk Shows. Immediately Cumming called for copies of all documentss. Since they didn't have them either.
Check your timeline. It's nonsense.
Care to try again? :roll:
Oct. 24: White House, State Department Emails on Ansar al-Sharia
Oct. 24: Reuters reports the White House, Pentagon and other government agencies learned just two hours into the Benghazi attack that Ansar al-Sharia, an Islamic militant group, had “claimed credit” for it. The wire service report was based on three emails from the State Department’s Operations Center. One of the emails said, “Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripol.” The article also noted, “Intelligence experts caution that initial reports from the scene of any attack or disaster are often inaccurate.” (It should be noted that Reuters first reported on Sept. 12 that unnamed U.S. officials believed that Ansar al-Sharia may have been involved.)
FactCheck.org : Benghazi Timeline
Sorry, I misunderstood your post...I thought you said Rice went on the Sunday talk shows a week before an email from Hillary.
Btw, what difference does it make what the terrorists are called before, during, after the fact? It still wouldn't have saved Amb. Stevens.
That's about all you really need to know. I'm not sure that there's anything to impeach over unless somebody can prove that Obama intended to have them die..Otherwise the worst it is is a terrible mistake
The point was Hillary testified that she didn't talk to anyone at that time, not even Susan Rice.....which again today they released a copy of a Diplomatic Cable to the Pres. of Libya. Which validated she spoke to the Libyan President to tell him that Al Shariah was involved. Then today Hicks confirmed she talked to him.
I watched the whole video, she was hardly objective. YOU couldn't bare posting the last two lines or provide a link. :shock:
... aaaaaand the little duckies continue to fall in line on Benghazi too
... aaaaaand the little duckies continue to fall in line on Benghazi too