1.) so ignore allows you to see my posts? interesting claim. . . .I seem to rmember gloating how you couldnt see them at one time
still upset and using failed insults i see, odd i thought for sure your post would be civil like usual. <end sarcasm> The honest posters simply disagree with your assessment :shrug:
Posts from blocked users come up as a header stating the poster's name, but lacking any of the actual body text. There is a button right underneath the name that says "view post" which lets you view the message like you would normally.
It would frankly be far more convenient if the input of ignored posters simply disappeared from your view entirely, but that is, sadly, not the case. We would not be having this conversation if it were.
2.) equal rights should be on everybody's list
The rights in question are subjective. Ideally, a homosexual candidate would be able to acknowledge this fact, and be willing to allow for the normal democratic and legislative process to run its course.
They can certainly support gay rights, but undue focus on executive or federal action meant to enforce their own views on the matter would be a definite turn off.
3.) what is the LBGT agenda
Simply put, the version of the homosexuality put forward by Gay Pride parades and most of the MSM media. Any given candidate's sexuality is frankly no one's business but their own.
It should not be deliberately made into a spectacle for the purposes of trying to force artifical notions of social acceptance down the public's throat.
4a.)I find it interesting that you assume this though. The majority of people here assumed all things being equal, you assumed that if the candidate was gay he/she deserves extra scrutiny and motives questioned.
7.)again i agree currently an openly gay candidate probably densest have a chance and thats pathetic and sad for america
8. interesting well try to answer the question head on like the majority of us did and assume the candidate matches your views and dont assume negatives.
So all things being equal, they are a good candidate and right for the job does being gay impact your vote?
Call me a cynic, but I simply do not see a Conservative (or even moderate) homosexual coming to the forefront of the American political scene any time soon.
Case in point...
9.) the MEDIA would never let this happen nor would bigots nor would gay extremists no matter what the candidate did. We saw this with obams and he is just half black LOL
Media and popular attitudes have such a polarizing impact on public perceptions of the personal lives of politicians that the idea of a homosexual presidential candidate being able to keep focus away from this particular aspect of their character in today's society simply cannot be taken as a serious possibility. This is exactly why I answered the poll above with a "no" response, instead of a more objective "not sure."
While I am certainly capable of thinking of a wide variety of situations in which I would theoretically vote for a homosexual candidate, absolutely none of them are even remotely plausible given how the issue of homosexuality is treated by so many people today. Virtually the only context I can think of in which a homosexual would have even a minute chance of attaining the presidency in today's society would be as some sort of demagogic "one note" Far Left publicity stunt focused almost entirely around gay rights and activism.
This is simply not the sort of thing that I would ever support.
The Obama Presidency already stinks to high heaven of this kind of thinking, and modern attitudes towards race relations are
massively more advanced than those surrounding sexuality.
