• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is responsible for the most terrorist attacks in the US?

Which group?


  • Total voters
    25
It would be a no-brainer. The USA police. Look at the Occupy protesters that were brutalized repeatedly by Police departments all over the country. Even that recent moron in Boston was not shooting at anyone, but was on the receiving end of lots of ordnance. If it hadn't been for all the photos and videos of the Occupy terrorism, they'd have gotten away with that. The USA "war on terror" is terrorism. Torture, kangaroo courts, no prosecution. Hmmm? Does that explain itself? I'm not afraid of external terrorism, but I'm damn sure afraid of my own government terrorists. Then the media distortion of acceptance of the gov't line makes them just ordinary stenographers for the propaganda brigade. Just makes you proud to be able to listen to the horsepuckey and mouth the platitudes. The "War on Terror" is just a full employment scenario for the profiteers in armaments manufacture. Then Korea and who is being terrorized. Fer Krissakes, we're 8,000 miles away from home on their turf with lots of weapons and politicians influenced by war profiteers who need/want a war and who should feel terrorized? Another no-brainer, but a lot of USA adjusted minds can't see the real world.
 
Nice work (and I mean that). It's the only possible defense. And yet the irony is overwhelming. SPLC's compromised moral position tainting their self-righteous pretensions.:roll:
The SPLC named the FRC a hate group because of their rhetoric about the gay community. What is wrong with that?????
 
The SPLC named the FRC a hate group because of their rhetoric about the gay community. What is wrong with that?????

we who know about the SPLC have named the SPLC a collection of hysterical liars, leftwing wolf criers, pimps and media whores
 
The SPLC named the FRC a hate group because of their rhetoric about the gay community. What is wrong with that?????

To call the FRC a hate group was crude, irresponsible hate mongering by the SPLC.:cool:
 
Not really, they speak about the dangers of Islam.

who does? people whose loved ones were in the twin towers? Marines who survived the barracks bombing circa 1983? the soldiers in Fort Hood?
 
the SPLC has a need to continually pandering to the fears of lefties so those lefties continue to send the Pimp Morris Dees and his flunkies more and more money. They create all sorts of boogeymen in order to pander to the weakminded or easily scared members of several interest groups including blacks, gays, Jews, and others who perceive themselves to be the targets of "right wing racist militias"

The SPLC has done far more good deeds then bad ones.

it has put several Klan organizations and racist groups out of business because of its lawsuits.

consider some of the following orginazations

Richard butlers aryan nations

CNN.com - Attorney Morris Dees pioneer in using 'damage litigation' to fight hate groups - September 7, 2000

and the christian knights of the ku klux klan

Macedonia v. Christian Knights of the Ku Klux Klan | Southern Poverty Law Center
 
The SPLC has done far more good deeds then bad ones.

it has put several Klan organizations and racist groups out of business because of its lawsuits.

consider some of the following orginazations

Richard butlers aryan nations

CNN.com - Attorney Morris Dees pioneer in using 'damage litigation' to fight hate groups - September 7, 2000

and the christian knights of the ku klux klan

Macedonia v. Christian Knights of the Ku Klux Klan | Southern Poverty Law Center

hard to say, he's pretty much a pimp who tries to keep "racism" stirred up so he gets attention.

I wonder what side he'd be on if white victims of black criminals were to sue the Nation of Islam, Al Sharpton, etc
 
hard to say, he's pretty much a pimp who tries to keep "racism" stirred up so he gets attention.

I wonder what side he'd be on if white victims of black criminals were to sue the Nation of Islam, Al Sharpton, etc


nation of islam and the black panthers are on thier hate group watch lists.

would you agree that his orginatzation has done some good by putting the aryan nations and christian knights of the ku klux Klan out of business.
 
nation of islam and the black panthers are on thier hate group watch lists.

would you agree that his orginatzation has done some good by putting the aryan nations and christian knights of the ku klux Klan out of business.

I think that should have been done by LE if those organizations had actually broke the law or conspired to break the law.
 
To call the FRC a hate group was crude, irresponsible hate mongering by the SPLC.:cool:
And the things the FRC said about the gays are just as crude, irresponsible and hate mongering.
 
The SPLC works closely with the FBI on matters related to civil rights and hate crimes.

I have issues with that since they are using an government organization to advance their far left propaganda. They have a self interest in inflating the actual dangers of morons like the klan and the WAR, two organizations run by cretins who disprove their organizations' mantra of racial superiority
 
And the things the FRC said about the gays are just as crude, irresponsible and hate mongering.

hardly a hate group. Using your criteria the Brady organization is a hate group given what those lying turds say about gun owners
 
Isn't the SPLC to terrorism about the same as Al Sharpton is to racism?


Think so.
 
And the things the FRC said about the gays are just as crude, irresponsible and hate mongering.

Well, no. Until quite recently they were what was called mainstream opinion. The SPLC tagged FRC to demonize political opponents, nothing more. Irresponsible.:cool:
 
Isn't the SPLC to terrorism about the same as Al Sharpton is to racism?


Think so.


an excellent observation. the white guys smeared by Sharpton should have used the same legal tactics against that moron sharpton that Dees did to the WAR etc
 
Well, no. Until quite recently they were what was called mainstream opinion. The SPLC tagged FRC to demonize political opponents, nothing more. Irresponsible.:cool:
Again, the same thing can be said about the FRC.
 
Back
Top Bottom