• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The divide between the rich and the rest

How serious a problem is the divide between the wealthy and the rest of us?

  • This divide does not exist.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    109
I know, I know. Statistics is well known liberal math! I don't even know why we still use it! Damned commies!

And you know what's leftist, socialist, liberal BS? Partial Differential Equations.

wikipedia is gossip at best, and brookings is well known for its liberal minded contributors. But we know you love your programming, lap it up.
 
They were rich because the government owned the wealth and they owned the government.

Thats what common ownership really means.

By the design of the con men who founded the Soviet Union.

It was NEVER a genuine attempt at communism.

It was top.down heirarchy with a facade of "communism".

From the gate.
 
and it is amazing how liberals become so programmed by liberally funded institutions and studies, well no it is really predictable

I guess belief in conspiracy theories about the evil of research only reinforces faith in fairy tales.
 
Interesting. Wikipedia, added to the list of liberal BS.

Are these also liberal BS?



Helll, I have posted things to wikipedia, they aren't picky about their sources
 
I don't even know what they are, so I'm just happy nobody tested me on that! :shock:

LOL, that was the highest level of math that I passed many moons ago...
 
One of the few things I can agree on with a socialist.

A huge problem cuz it shows that ****ing trickle down economics is a giant sham.
The rich will now spend a vast majority of their money trying to shape the "rules of the game" in their favour more than they alerady have..
Plus i dont see how you can view a vast inequality as a "good thing"


Wealth Inequality In America - YouTube
 
Well, it's true that time flies when you're having fun!

But now I have to say g'nite to all.

Be well.
 
By the design of the con men who founded the Soviet Union.

It was NEVER a genuine attempt at communism.

It was top.down heirarchy with a facade of "communism".

From the gate.

I'd argue that was an inevitable outcome of any attempt at communism. Human nature doesn't change.
 
and it is amazing how liberals become so programmed by liberally funded institutions and studies, well no it is really predictable

or how they want us to think that

1) this is a problem

2) and a government solution is going to be useful
 
or how they want us to think that

1) this is a problem

2) and a government solution is going to be useful

Health cost are up for everyone since ACA and it hasn't even gotten started, how much more do liberal minded people want the American people to get screwed?
 
Jealousy is the only real issue. A spotlight shined upon it in the last election; some were against Mitt simply for being rich.

probably because he was against half of the population for being poor ...
 
I think what you ignore is that even if there is a problem, a government solution is worse

I fail to see the relevance of this response to what I said.

perhaps this is part of the problem.

you rely on your own overactive imagination to fill in the blanks.

kind of like a kid who thinks there are monsters under the bed because he doesn't know what is there.
 
I fail to see the relevance of this response to what I said.

perhaps this is part of the problem.

you rely on your own overactive imagination to fill in the blanks.

kind of like a kid who thinks there are monsters under the bed because he doesn't know what is there.

condescending sanctimony really doesn't work unless you can prove you are more intelligent and more educated than the target of the snarkiness. I suspect you would fail dramatically if you tried and once again, foreigners' opinions on America don't rate much merit with me.

The fact is, the hand wringing ninnies who whine that there is a widening gap almost always demand the government do something about it without contemplating that government solutions may well be the sloth inducing problem that has led to the gap increasing
 
Back
Top Bottom