View Poll Results: Vote:

Voters
30. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, there probably are more abortion doctors like Gosnell

    24 80.00%
  • No, Gosnell is an anomaly

    6 20.00%
Page 27 of 27 FirstFirst ... 17252627
Results 261 to 268 of 268

Thread: "The House of Horrors" Gosnell case

  1. #261
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA
    Last Seen
    08-25-16 @ 08:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    1,622

    Re: "The House of Horrors" Gosnell case

    Quote Originally Posted by Removable Mind View Post
    That certainly is the law.

    But the law does point out the term "Child in Utero" does not imply "personhood" at any stage of development. Nor does it relate to women who have lawful abortions. It is a legal term only to apply to situations stated within that particular law.

    And there is no defined stage of development in this law. If a woman is pregnant...at any stage...and both murdered during the commission of a crime...bad news for the murder. It's a double whammy.
    If it is murder to kill the child in the process of killing the pregnant mother it stands to reason it is murder to kill only the innocent child in the womb.

  2. #262
    Irremovable Intelligence
    Removable Mind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:25 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    23,517

    Re: "The House of Horrors" Gosnell case

    Quote Originally Posted by dnsmith View Post
    If it is murder to kill the child in the process of killing the pregnant mother it stands to reason it is murder to kill only the innocent child in the womb.
    If that's your personal belief. The Supreme Court has a different take on it.

  3. #263
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,808

    Re: "The House of Horrors" Gosnell case

    Quote Originally Posted by dnsmith View Post
    1.)Excellent description and definition of most abortions.
    2.)(Some abortions are done to remove a dead baby in the womb)
    3.)All others are murder.

    4.)But be aware that I am pro-choice.
    5.)God gave humans free will.
    6.)Those who get or give abortions have the free will to do so,
    7.)and if they do not reconcile themselves with God they have the right to burn in hell.
    just to be clear, not saying you claimed your words were fact or not just pointing out the obvious

    1.) only in opinion and not fact
    2.) yes and after some abortion the Fetus lives
    3.) as already proven not factually true, at best thats your opinion
    4.) nothing to beware about everybody has the right to believe what they choose
    5.) whether i agree or not this is also just opinion
    6.) correct
    7.) again even if i agree thats still just opinion

    also on an end note, being how you are (or me GUESSING ho you are) is the perfect way to be in america and in religion. I applaud that.
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  4. #264
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,808

    Re: "The House of Horrors" Gosnell case

    Quote Originally Posted by dnsmith View Post
    If it is murder to kill the child in the process of killing the pregnant mother it stands to reason it is murder to kill only the innocent child in the womb.
    law simply disagrees
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  5. #265
    Struggler
    JayDubya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Seen
    11-09-17 @ 04:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    17,181

    Re: "The House of Horrors" Gosnell case

    Quote Originally Posted by iguanaman View Post
    We are not talking about "humans all ages" though so that is a fail.
    Goes beyond false into just being stupid.

    The truth is that nature has so little regard for a zygote because they are not humans
    The truth is that nature has no regard for anything because nature doesn't have any mentation at the helm to regard anything. Duh.

    Also, incredibly stupid. A living Homo sapiens is a human.

  6. #266
    I'm kind of a big deal

    AGENT J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:40 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    44,808

    Re: "The House of Horrors" Gosnell case

    Quote Originally Posted by JayDubya View Post
    Goes beyond false into just being stupid.



    The truth is that nature has no regard for anything because nature doesn't have any mentation at the helm to regard anything. Duh.

    Also, incredibly stupid. A living Homo sapiens is a human.
    facts have defeated you once again, a daily occurrence around here
    This space is currently owned by The Great Winchester, stay tuned for future messages!
    Make America Great Again!
    Pro-Equal Rights / Pro-Gun Rights / Pro-Human Rights / Pro-Choice

  7. #267
    Sage

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Florida
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    23,373

    Re: "The House of Horrors" Gosnell case

    Quote Originally Posted by JayDubya View Post
    Goes beyond false into just being stupid.



    The truth is that nature has no regard for anything because nature doesn't have any mentation at the helm to regard anything. Duh.

    Also, incredibly stupid. A living Homo sapiens is a human.
    Another fail. Nature in the form of instincts has taken great care in protecting the young of all species. It is matter of "investment". The more time and energy invested in offspring the more important they are. There is little investment in a zygote in time or energy therefore nature has devised methods (miscarriage) to eliminate the potentially wasted energy and time that a less than perfect zygote or fetus would incur. Nature dose this as much as 65% of the time. We are merely using our brains to further improve the odds of successful offspring when we abort for genetic reasons or even if the child is just not wanted at this time. Arguing with Mother Nature is not wise. That is usually what Religions do and is another reason I think that pro-life is essentially a RELIGOUS movement.

  8. #268
    Freedom Fighter
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Utopia
    Last Seen
    12-11-17 @ 03:23 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    967

    RE: "The House of Horrors" Gosnell case

    Well, if I deem you an oxygen thief because I think you are genetically inferior, and use my brain to improve the gene pool or you are just an inconvenience, based on your reasoning, if the supreme court says so, I can abort YOU. Good logic there big guy...I seem to recall we went to war over something like that about 62 years ago.
    Sent from my Nokia Lumia 920 using Board Express

Page 27 of 27 FirstFirst ... 17252627

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •