You mean the ones that show the small bodies dismembered because of repeated hits from the semi-automatic rifle? Nah. We can't have people being upset now, can we?
Meanwhile, back at the ranch:
Boy, 4, accidentally kills Tenn. deputy's wife
You mean the ones that show the small bodies dismembered because of repeated hits from the semi-automatic rifle? Nah. We can't have people being upset now, can we?
Meanwhile, back at the ranch:
Boy, 4, accidentally kills Tenn. deputy's wife
This has what to do with Newtown???
I am not sure what you are trying to say
What I'm trying to say here is that by virtue of carrying a weapon capable of multiple shots without the necessity of reloading for a while, the killer was able to shoot small children so many times he actually dismembered some of them. Does that help?
we know this...we do not need to see the victims in this state...
respect their person.
Just another one of those heartwarming stories about how guns are used by everyday citizens to protect themselves......oh, wait a minute.....never mind.
Or respect the sensibilities of those who see no need to regulate these kinds of weapons?
You mean the ones that show the small bodies dismembered because of repeated hits from the semi-automatic rifle? Nah. We can't have people being upset now, can we?
Meanwhile, back at the ranch:
Boy, 4, accidentally kills Tenn. deputy's wife
I see no need to disrespect the dead that way.Should the horrific photos of Newtown victims be published?
Yes
Only if all the parents agree.
No
from your conclusion , it's just another example of the madness brought about by the 2nd amendment...Wow, did they go out of their way to NOT say what kind of firearm. I doubt it was an AR15, they dare not say what it was.
Here is another example of a gun death that NONE of proposed legislation would have prevented.
This thread is about photos, not guns. What kinds of cameras are you proposing we ban/register? Should there be an NICS before buying any kind camera, or don't you care if felons photograph your children? Don't you want to do anything about high-capacity paparazzi-style full-auto assault-cameras? Why do you need a fast shutter? Why do you need a 400x optical zoom? Why do you need a detachable high-capacity battery? You don't need 10gigs to photo a deer.from your conclusion , it's just another example of the madness brought about by the 2nd amendment...
you people are not mature enough to have such a law.
I say no.Legally I do not think they should be stopped.But morally those media outlets should have the integrity to not publish those photos. I also think the media should have also have the integrity to not make an instant celeb out of every pathetic loser who shoots up a school.Should the horrific photos of Newtown victims be published?
Yes
Only if all the parents agree.
No
you point of conjecture is due to what exactly?This thread is about photos, not guns.
Now read the rest of that post.you point of conjecture is due to what exactly?
What I'm trying to say here is that by virtue of carrying a weapon capable of multiple shots without the necessity of reloading for a while, the killer was able to shoot small children so many times he actually dismembered some of them. Does that help?
Ger we have been this route before and it always ends in pain...Now read the rest of that post.
So you just don't care about the victims of internet bullying.Ger we have been this route before and it always ends in pain...
i have a fondness for you and don;t want to ruin it with reality