• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When the issue is gay marriage who are the intolerant ones?

When the issue is gay marriage who are the intolerant one?

  • Total voters
    45
Navy Pride said:

Your getting desperate my left wing friend...Again interracial marrige is not the same as SSM and never will be and you know it....It is a slippery slope that won't work.
Click to expand...
It's exactly the same, it's discrimination about who a person can or can't marry.
 
Kreton said:
Just in this one thread you have repeatedly judged gay people, and you seem to be fighting pretty hard to ensure that you control what those people do. Your entire post is a lie.
Click to expand...

Only in the mind of a mixed up lefty........All I ask is one thing, I do not want the definition of marriage changed......How you can get that I judge gay people with that statement is ridiculous...I guess I will just consider the source .
 
navy pride said:
only in the mind of a mixed up lefty........all i ask is one thing, i do not want the definition of marriage changed......how you can get that i judge gay people with that statement is ridiculous...i guess i will just consider the source .
Click to expand...

you, not i, nor any one owns the word marriage! People are free to use it as they like
 
Black Manta said:
You would however deny them equal protection under our secular law. This is not biblical at all. Sin is sin. I don't see you rallying to have divorce made so that it can only be done because of adultery by the female. I don't see you rallying for fornicators to be imprisoned or shunned, or having rights stripped.

Seriously it's views like yours that make Christians look like hypocrites.
Click to expand...

Its hard for me to debate someone who claims to be a Social Conservative that does not believe in what conservatives believe. I really dn't know how you live with yourself. Here is a flash for you...Conservatives do not endorse SSM..........Have a nice evening.
 
winston53660 said:
you, not i, nor any one owns the word marriage! People are free to use it as they like
Click to expand...

Are you sure of that? I don't think the people in 41 state who have constiitutional amendments would agree with you.
 
Navy Pride said:

Are you sure of that? I don't think the people in 41 state who have constiitutional amendments would agree with you.
Click to expand...

... What gives you ownership of the word "marriage" and how it's defined? :)
 
Navy Pride said:

Are you sure of that? I don't think the people in 41 state who have constiitutional amendments would agree with you.
Click to expand...

It looks like only about 30 of those would continue to back them, with that number rapidly shrinking. If your argument to oppose gay marriage is popular opinion, then the argument will not hold for much longer most likely.
 
navy pride said:

are you sure of that? I don't think the people in 41 state who have constiitutional amendments would agree with you.
Click to expand...

gays are married!gays are married!gays are married!gays are married!gays are married!gays are married!gays are married!gays are married!gays are married!gays are married!

bwaaaahahahahaha


come get me Gov Perry

frankenstein-mob.jpg
 
Last edited:
Navy Pride said:
Its hard for me to debate someone who claims to be a Social Conservative that does not believe in what conservatives believe.
Click to expand...

I am not a social conservative and have never claimed to be. In fact I have no idea how you came to that conclusion. I am a fiscal conservative and Christian. I am not a Republican, I am a Constitutionalist.

You can't debate me because I am right, and you know it.

I don't like SSM or condone it personally as I think it is as much a sin as the others I mentioned. This does not however have anything to do with the laws of the US. Banning SSM is unconstitutional and nothing but bigotry at it's finest. SSM deserve the same protections financially under the law as any other married couple. They will not be recognized or married by my church, so it will not affect me in any way. So why should I deny them financial rights and recognition as being together under secular law?

Navy Pride said:
I really dn't know how you live with yourself.
Click to expand...

Easy I am not a hypocrite and do not hate the sinner, I hate the sin. I know I am no better than they as I sin as well.

Must be hard being perfect even though it was said...

There is none righteous, no not one.

Navy Pride said:
Here is a flash for you...Conservatives do not endorse SSM..........Have a nice evening.
Click to expand...

Heres a flash for you... You don't even know what a conservative is, never have and never will.

God bless you... You need it.
 
Navy Pride said:
Only in the mind of a mixed up lefty........All I ask is one thing, I do not want the definition of marriage changed......How you can get that I judge gay people with that statement is ridiculous...I guess I will just consider the source .
Click to expand...

Anyone want to know what the typical simple minded fool who cant think for himself resorts to when he he cant refute something or support his own statement? See the above quote.
 
Boy all these posts attacking me personally are a perfect example of what I am talking about in this thread....You just can't help it............so sad.
 
Navy Pride said:
Boy all these posts attacking me personally are a perfect example of what I am talking about in this thread....You just can't help it............so sad.
Click to expand...

You'll find people of all sides of the political spectrum who engage in personal attacks. Theirs do not negate or change the validity of their arguments.
 
Navy Pride said:
....All I ask is one thing, I do not want the definition of marriage changed....
Click to expand...
Fine, then lets substitute "marriage" with "civil union" in all the law books and court decisions for the past 200+ years. I'm good with that.

If you want any of the legal rights/privileges enjoyed by "married" couples now, you can register your civil union at the local county courthouse. :)
 
winston53660 said:
you, not i, nor any one owns the word marriage! People are free to use it as they like
Click to expand...

I agree, which is why states can chose to use it to mean one man one woman or same sex couples. Any couple, legally recognize or not, could also call themselves married.
 
Anagram said:
You'll find people of all sides of the political spectrum who engage in personal attacks. Theirs do not negate or change the validity of their arguments.
Click to expand...

Its funny I don't see gays getting attacked personally....The only ones being attacked are the people thaat do,t want the definition of marriage changed...........I think most people would go for Civil Unions with all the benefits.
 
digsbe said:
I agree, which is why states can chose to use it to mean one man one woman or same sex couples. Any couple, legally recognize or not, could also call themselves married.
Click to expand...

Exactly any group defined by the sexual preference would be included.
 
Navy Pride said:
Exactly any group defined by the sexual preference would be included.
Click to expand...
Even a gay couple can call themselves married in social situations whether you or the state agree or not. So far at least, neither you nor the state can dictate popular use of a word.
 
MoSurveyor said:
Even a gay couple can call themselves married in social situations whether you or the state agree or not. So far at least, neither you nor the state can dictate popular use of a word.
Click to expand...


You are right they can call themselves anything they like. Getting it recognized or legal is another matter[
 
Navy Pride said:
You are right they can call themselves anything they like. Getting it recognized or legal is another matter[
Click to expand...
Marriage shouldn't be a legal institution if you want to keep your definition of it.
 
Navy Pride said:
DD is that your best shot? Your losing it my left wing friend...:lamo
Click to expand...

Actually Np.....you are the one losing it.....have you not been paying attention for the last year? You and your ilk are going down at a rapid pace. The dominoes are dropping like flies....even your Republican friends are making the switch. You are in for a big shock in a month. Be prepared.

Even ultra-conservative Larry Elder said yesterday that he expects a 5-4 decision legalizing gay marriage across the country. It will either be 5-4 or 6-3. I would say 6-3 because Roberts doesn't want to be on the wrong side of history.
 
Navy Pride said:

Its funny I don't see gays getting attacked personally....The only ones being attacked are the people thaat do,t want the definition of marriage changed...........I think most people would go for Civil Unions with all the benefits.
Click to expand...

MOST people are in favor of marriage equality....have you been living on the moon?
 
Navy Pride said:
As I have said a dozen times but you lefties just don't get it so I will say it one more time......Interracial is a marriage between a man and a woman....SSM is betwween 2 people of the same sex. No comparison at all. I know your a lefty and its very difficult for you when you cite left wing talking points on the issues but they just don't equate...........
Click to expand...

And before Loving....marriage was between ONE Race in most of the Country. I know it is difficult for you to comprehend NP....but LOVING changed the definition of marriage to allow marriages like yours, despite the fact that many in the country found marriages like yours to be "icky" and perverted.
 
disneydude said:
And before Loving....marriage was between ONE Race in most of the Country. I know it is difficult for you to comprehend NP....but LOVING changed the definition of marriage to allow marriages like yours, despite the fact that many in the country found marriages like yours to be "icky" and perverted.
Click to expand...

Slipperry slope.
 
Navy Pride said:
Its hard for me to debate someone who claims to be a Social Conservative that does not believe in what conservatives believe. I really dn't know how you live with yourself. Here is a flash for you...Conservatives do not endorse SSM..........Have a nice evening.
Click to expand...

Navy Pride said:
Boy all these posts attacking me personally are a perfect example of what I am talking about in this thread....You just can't help it............so sad.
Click to expand...

Pot meet kettle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom