• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When the issue is gay marriage who are the intolerant ones?

When the issue is gay marriage who are the intolerant one?

  • Total voters
    45
Navy Pride said:
If thinking the definition of marriage should not be changed I plead guilty......What that has to do with SSM I will never understand.
Click to expand...

You are showing your hypocrisy yet again NP...because you DO support the definition of marriage changing when you agree with the change in definition. It has been shown to you countless times that prior to Loving v. Virginia, your marriage was considered perverted and disgusting by the laws in over 1/2 of the Country. A decade prior to that, your marriage would have been recognized in only a handful of states.

You Support changing the definition of marriage....just not for reasons that YOU find "icky".

Again....what is your obsession with posting every week another anti-gay thread? Methinks thou protests too much....
 
Navy Pride said:

Not true, I could care less what your opinion is but as you can see if mine is different I am a bigot as proven by your post.
Click to expand...

You have every right to be a bigot. There is no law that prevents it. You are entitled to your bigoted beliefs and opinions, I have never said otherwise. You are not, however free to force others to adhere to your bigoted views. That is what you fail to understand.
 
disneydude said:
You are showing your hypocrisy yet again NP...because you DO support the definition of marriage changing when you agree with the change in definition. It has been shown to you countless times that prior to Loving v. Virginia, your marriage was considered perverted and disgusting by the laws in over 1/2 of the Country. A decade prior to that, your marriage would have been recognized in only a handful of states.

You Support changing the definition of marriage....just not for reasons that YOU find "icky".

Again....what is your obsession with posting every week another anti-gay thread? Methinks thou protests too much....
Click to expand...

If you say interracial is changing it I disagree because its still between a man and a woman as God wants.........If you say two men then that is changing it.........I believe any man should be able to marry any woman period and always have..
 
Navy Pride said:
And I stand by it.
Click to expand...

Which makes my point valid. When you compare a group of people to animals, you lose the right to complain about intolerant people.
 
Redress said:
Which makes my point valid. When you compare a group of people to animals, you lose the right to complain about intolerant people.
Click to expand...

Bingo!!!!! I rest my case...
 
Navy Pride said:
I don't want federal gov. involved in SSM. You want that because its the only way you could ever win.
Click to expand...

You want government force, indeed you do. As I said, I'll never understand you big government communists who cannot handle a little freedom and liberty and thus must turn to the force of government to prevent others from exercising their rights and liberties. But I guess the world will always be full of big government leftists as yourself.
 
Navy Pride said:
If you say interracial is changing it I disagree because its still between a man and a woman as God wants.........If you say two men then that is changing it.........I believe any man should be able to marry any woman period and always have..
Click to expand...

Just you disagree doesn't change the facts NP. The definition of marriage prior to Loving would not have allowed YOUR marriage. YOUR marriage was only allowed because the definition of marriage was CHANGED to allow it. Sorry. That is just the simple truth. The fact that you don't want to accept the facts does not mean that the facts do not exist.
 
Ikari said:
You want government force, indeed you do. As I said, I'll never understand you big government communists who cannot handle a little freedom and liberty and thus must turn to the force of government to prevent others from exercising their rights and liberties. But I guess the world will always be full of big government leftists as yourself.
Click to expand...

NP is ABSOLUTELY a fan of Big Brother Government. But he is definitely not a leftist.
 
disneydude said:
NP is ABSOLUTELY a fan of Big Brother Government. But he is definitely not a leftist.
Click to expand...

Oh, that government loving leftist is left of me.
 
Navy Pride said:
If you say interracial is changing it I disagree because its still between a man and a woman as God wants......... ..
Click to expand...

Speaking for God again? I thought that you were only the spokesperson for "Christians". ????
 
Navy Pride said:

Its true there are some on the right who are intolerant but everyone on the left is intolerant of people on the right...I live in the Seattle Washington area and I can tell you none of us on the right dare to give our opinion.
Click to expand...

That is such an ignorant blanket statement. I have many friends and family who are libo's and we argue politics and get along fine. So no, you can't speak about a large diverse group in those terms. It's as silly as the libo's who think all conservatives are racist.
 
Ikari said:
You want government force, indeed you do. As I said, I'll never understand you big government communists who cannot handle a little freedom and liberty and thus must turn to the force of government to prevent others from exercising their rights and liberties. But I guess the world will always be full of big government leftists as yourself.
Click to expand...

I want the people to vote. just like they did in Calfornia..........You don't you know you can not win if activist judges get involved.
 
Navy Pride said:
I want the people to vote. just like they did in Calfornia..........You don't you know you can not win if activist judges get involved.
Click to expand...

I don't believe in pure democracy, never have, my left wing friend. Pure democracy is mob rule where the rights and liberties of the minority cannot be guaranteed. I'll never support such a system. I endorse a Republic, a system based on laws and committed to the freedoms and liberties of its people. I guess we differ there, big government lefty, I want freedom and you want mob rule. Poor leftist NP...got no love for the Republic.
 
Ikari said:
I don't believe in pure democracy, never have, my left wing friend. Pure democracy is mob rule where the rights and liberties of the minority cannot be guaranteed. I'll never support such a system. I endorse a Republic, a system based on laws and committed to the freedoms and liberties of its people. I guess we differ there, big government lefty, I want freedom and you want mob rule. Poor leftist NP...got no love for the Republic.
Click to expand...

Well you live in the wrong country because we have a democratic government here.......You ever consider moving? I am sure Iran North Korea or Cuba would be glad to have you.
 
Navy Pride said:
Well you live in the wrong country because we have a democratic government here.......You ever consider moving? I am sure Iran North Korea or Cuba would be glad to have you.
Click to expand...

Ahhh, you and Muddy Creek....peas in a pod.

No, in case you never learned history, my left wing friend, we have a Republic; not a pure democracy. Don't be a dumbass.
 
Navy Pride said:
Well you live in the wrong country because we have a democratic government here.......You ever consider moving? I am sure Iran North Korea or Cuba would be glad to have you.
Click to expand...

We have a Republic form of government...which is different than a democratic form of government.
 
Black Manta said:
That is such an ignorant blanket statement. I have many friends and family who are libo's and we argue politics and get along fine. So no, you can't speak about a large diverse group in those terms. It's as silly as the libo's who think all conservatives are racist.
Click to expand...

If you don't know my left wing friend maybe you should keep quiet.......I live here for the last 36 years I know what is going on you don't. Question for you my left wing friend . Why do you list yourself as a Conservative when you are clearly a bleedig heart liberal?
 
Navy Pride said:

If you don't know my left wing friend maybe you should keep quiet.......I live here for the last 36 years I know what is going on you don't. Question for you my left wing friend . Why do you list yourself as a Conservative when you are clearly a bleedig heart liberal?
Click to expand...

Should all bleeding heart Liberals be given the death penalty? Or how about a massive movement by conservatives to commit Liberalcide? That would learn'em durn'em...
 
Navy Pride said:

If you don't know my left wing friend maybe you should keep quiet.......I live here for the last 36 years I know what is going on you don't. Question for you my left wing friend . Why do you list yourself as a Conservative when you are clearly a bleedig heart liberal?
Click to expand...

OMG...:lamo

Clue for you: BM is more conservative than you are.
 
Redress said:
OMG...:lamo

Clue for you: BM is more conservative than you are.
Click to expand...

Lots of people are more conservative than that big government loving commie.
 
Ikari said:
Ahhh, you and Muddy Creek....peas in a pod.

No, in case you never learned history, my left wing friend, we have a Republic; not a pure democracy. Don't be a dumbass.
Click to expand...

Hey already in to the name calling because we disagree...I rest my case.......
 
Navy Pride said:

Hey already in to the name calling because we disagree...I rest my case.......
Click to expand...

No, my left wing friend, it's because you couldn't even identify the proper structure of the United States. Though I do find your statement here ironic given your past posts on this subject. So at least you're worth some laughs, commie.
 
Removable Mind said:
Should all bleeding heart Liberals be given the death penalty? Or how about a massive movement by conservatives to commit Liberalcide? That would learn'em durn'em...
Click to expand...

No, they should all become Social Conservatives.
 
Navy Pride said:
I want the people to vote. just like they did in Calfornia..........You don't you know you can not win if activist judges get involved.
Click to expand...

Are you ok with putting your marriage up to a popular vote Navy? Let the states decide for themselves?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom