• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

When the issue is gay marriage who are the intolerant ones?

When the issue is gay marriage who are the intolerant one?


  • Total voters
    45
Jesus Christ I was married by the Counsel general in the American embassy.......Do you really think they would have married us if it wasn't legal......You get more ridiculous with every post.

Miscegenation laws were state laws not federal.
 
Jesus Christ I was married by the Counsel general in the American embassy.......Do you really think they would have married us if it wasn't legal......You get more ridiculous with every post.

Again, it wasn't illegal in South Korea which is the civil law the Counsel General in South Korea operates under. Do you not understand that simple point yet? You weren't married under American law, you were married under Korean law, that's why it was legal. Focus like a laser beam on that simple point.

You know, you're so incredibly wrong on "the facts" which make up your own life that I can't imagine you've actually gone through any of it. A few months ago UtahBill caught you in a lie when you beat your chest like a big desk war job hero. Now, this incredibly dumb claim. It's dumb because you don't even understand what law you actually got married under.
 
Last edited:
So you have nothing basically. You claim that the Ballot Box will determine it and when the ballot box has gone against you, you create mirages in the desert. You were wrong. It will be the Courts or it will be what we have :2wave:

LOL.....keep living in the past...the rest of us are moving on to the future. Bye Bye.......
 
In fact I have been paying attention and I know 41 states have all banned gay marriage and 9 states have allowed it (all blue) now you have to deal with red states..........good luck

Almost exactly the same that banned inter-racial marriage before it was legal. By the way....I don't need luck. Just a couple months and the issue will be moot. Are you ready? I certainly hope so.
 
Which has nothing to do with nothing. I was married to and Asian in 1966 so nice try. There were zero restrictions when I got married.
Wrong. In Missouri (and I suspect many other states as well) it was illegal. Try again.
 
Last edited:
March 17 1966 I was married in Seoul Korea by the counsel general of the U.S.
According to the good residents of the State of Missouri your marriage was illegal and should have never happened. Had you been here it wouldn't have happened. Your continued denial of the facts change nothing.
 
Last edited:
Libertarians align themselves to the religious right by voting conservative as they often do.

SO.... because Classical Liberalists vote conservatively on economic concerns, that makes us sellouts? Economic conservatism is something that is fundamental to Classical Liberalism (Libertarianism) btw.
 
SO.... because Classical Liberalists vote conservatively on economic concerns, that makes us sellouts? Economic conservatism is something that is fundamental to Classical Liberalism (Libertarianism) btw.


What is "economic conservatism"?
 
What is "economic conservatism"?

In its simplest form, it is the theory and practice of little to no government interference with the economy in order to promote growth.
 
voted "gay" just to keep up appearances. truth is both sides are equally intolerant
 
According to the good residents of the State of Missouri your marriage was illegal and should have never happened. Had you been here it wouldn't have happened. Your continued denial of the facts change nothing.

Your getting desperate my left wing friend...Again interracial marrige is not the same as SSM and never will be and you know it....It is a slippery slope that won't work.
 

Your getting desperate my left wing friend...Again interracial marrige is not the same as SSM and never will be and you know it....It is a slippery slope that won't work.

How is it different? The primary argument used back when interracial marriage was banned was:

“Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he
placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his
arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he
separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.”

(Source: Virginia trial judge upholding conviction of Mildred and Richard
Loving for interracial marriage, quoted in Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 3
(1967))

Why is it different this time? And why do you believe that marriage is only a christian concept?
 
How is it different? The primary argument used back when interracial marriage was banned was:

Why is it different this time? And why do you believe that marriage is only a christian concept?

To be honest Rabid, the Bible never supported the interracial laws etc. It does however include homosexual practices in the same category as incest, fornication and adultery. Sexual sins are part of Christianity, racism is not. This of course is not a reason to deny same sex couples who are adults the same protections under our secular law.
 
To be honest Rabid, the Bible never supported the interracial laws etc. It does however include homosexual practices in the same category as incest, fornication and adultery. Sexual sins are part of Christianity, racism is not. This of course is not a reason to deny same sex couples who are adults the same protections under our secular law.
You're absolutely right, it didn't. It also never supported forcing christian values on non-believers via government force, which really makes every religious argument moot. I just wish more people could see that.
 
How is it different? The primary argument used back when interracial marriage was banned was:



Why is it different this time? And why do you believe that marriage is only a christian concept?

As I have said a dozen times but you lefties just don't get it so I will say it one more time......Interracial is a marriage between a man and a woman....SSM is betwween 2 people of the same sex. No comparison at all. I know your a lefty and its very difficult for you when you cite left wing talking points on the issues but they just don't equate...........
 
As I have said a dozen times but you lefties just don't get it so I will say it one more time......Interracial is a marriage between a man and a woman....SSM is betwween 2 people of the same sex. No comparison at all. I know your a lefty and its very difficult for you when you cite left wing talking points on the issues but they just don't equate...........

Classic NP. Anyone who doesn't hate gays is clearly a lefty.

And yes, the same exact arguments were used.

My question again: What part of the bible told you to use the government to force non-believers to do what you want? Why do you feel that you can judge gays? Did god not say that he's the only one who can judge?
 
As I have said a dozen times but you lefties just don't get it so I will say it one more time......Interracial is a marriage between a man and a woman....SSM is betwween 2 people of the same sex. No comparison at all. I know your a lefty and its very difficult for you when you cite left wing talking points on the issues but they just don't equate...........

I would take is 'lefty' talking points over your made up garbage any day.

Be careful throwing throwing those stones from your glass house.
 
realistically, why should either side be "tolerant" of the other? In their mind, the other side is "wrong". there can be no tolerance or compromise. this is one of those situations where it is either one or the other. either you support gay marriage or you don't
 
Classic NP. Anyone who doesn't hate gays is clearly a lefty.

And yes, the same exact arguments were used


My question again: What part of the bible told you to use the government to force non-believers to do what you want? Why do you feel that you can judge gays? Did god not say that he's the only one who can judge?

Well I hate no one and I am not and I am no lefty.:confused:

SIZE=4]I don't care what non believers do....In the end they will answer to God for their sins as we all will.

I judge no one.
[/SIZE]
 
Last edited:
Well I hate no one and I am not and I am no lefty.:confused:

SIZE=4]I don't care what non believers do....In the end they will answer to God for their sins as we all will.

I judge no one.
[/SIZE]

Just in this one thread you have repeatedly judged gay people, and you seem to be fighting pretty hard to ensure that you control what those people do. Your entire post is a lie.
 
Well I hate no one and I am not and I am no lefty.:confused:

SIZE=4]I don't care what non believers do....In the end they will answer to God for their sins as we all will.

I judge no one.
[/SIZE]

You would however deny them equal protection under our secular law. This is not biblical at all. Sin is sin. I don't see you rallying to have divorce made so that it can only be done because of adultery by the female. I don't see you rallying for fornicators to be imprisoned or shunned, or having rights stripped.

Seriously it's views like yours that make Christians look like hypocrites.
 
Well I hate no one and I am not and I am no lefty.:confused:

SIZE=4]I don't care what non believers do....In the end they will answer to God for their sins as we all will.

I judge no one.
[/SIZE]

You judge everyone, except yourself, with your nasty comments.

Judge, lest ye be judged, remember?
 
Well I hate no one and I am not and I am no lefty.:confused:

SIZE=4]I don't care what non believers do....In the end they will answer to God for their sins as we all will.

I judge no one.
[/SIZE]

If you didn't care, you wouldn't be going on and on and made god knows how many threads about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom