• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should you have to have a permit to grow your own garden at your residence?

Should you have to have a permit to grow your own garden at your residence?


  • Total voters
    42

Luna Tick

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
2,148
Reaction score
867
Location
Nebraska
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
A neighbor of a friend of mine proposed this to her city council. She wanted people to have to get a permit to grow a garden in their own yard. In order to get the permit, your immediate neighbors would have to sign off on it.
 
A neighbor of a friend of mine proposed this to her city council. She wanted people to have to get a permit to grow a garden in their own yard. In order to get the permit, your immediate neighbors would have to sign off on it.

Is this in the front yard? Or do they mean in any part of the property?
 
No you shouldn't have to get a permit, I wish more people had gardens.
 
No, unless you've signed onto a HOA that restricts this its your property.

I take issue with a great many zoning laws.
 
absolutely not. if my neighbors want to control my back yard, they can pay rent.

luckily, my neighbors aren't jerks. sometimes I give them tomatoes.
 
Within reason, I would suggest that the answer is "No". However, I have seen situations where individuals or families have expanded simple home gardens into sizeable plots of agricultural land either for personal use or for commercial enterprise. So long as it is not an eyesore to the neighborhood, you're not using it for a commercial venture, and/or you are not requiring agricultural vehicles to tend the garden I would suggest that a permit should not be required. As soon as any of those other conditions are met, I would suggest that some sort of licensing or oversight should be involved.
 
The front yard or the back yard. Either one.

Then the lady can piss off. What a bitch. I am doing a big garden this year. Zucchini, green beans, Tomatoes the works. County can kiss my ass.
 
No, you shouldn't have to get a permit to have a garden at home. The only reason I would think it valid for the city/county/township/whatever government to step in is if you're somehow making a nuisance of yourself with it.
 
A neighbor of a friend of mine proposed this to her city council. She wanted people to have to get a permit to grow a garden in their own yard. In order to get the permit, your immediate neighbors would have to sign off on it.
I'm very much a "no" on face value but I am curious as to why they think this is necessary or desirable. Do you know?

I do think you should require some kind of permit to remove a garden though. There is something of an issue in some UK towns and cities with a trend of paving over front gardens to provide off-street parking. A major problem with that is it removes a lot of natural drainage and increases the flooding in heavy rain.
 
She is probably pissed her neighbor won't share their tomatoes :)
 
That is just plain nonsense. What possible basis is there to stop someone from growing a plant? Ok, if your neighbor is gone and put organic fertilizer all over the yard, that might be something to raise a stink about, but other than that, how can someone be offended by a garden? Is she a vegetable seller?
 
No you shouldn't have to get a permit, I wish more people had gardens.
Iwish more people had cojones - then the politically correct dildos would not be foisting such crap on their communities.
 
A neighbor of a friend of mine proposed this to her city council. She wanted people to have to get a permit to grow a garden in their own yard. In order to get the permit, your immediate neighbors would have to sign off on it.

That's bulls**t!! What does she gain from giving government more power? Thats just one example of people allowing vast government overreach thats taking over this country. "lightning, you now need to request permission from your local government in order to piss on your own property and plant tomatoes". This is the world my children will live in.
 
Iwish more people had cojones - then the politically correct dildos would not be foisting such crap on their communities.

What does this have to do with political correctness in any way. I didn't know this was about offending gardens.
 
That's bulls**t!! Thats jsut one example of vast government overreach thats taking over this country. "lightning, you now need to request permission from your local government in order to piss on your own property and plant tomatoes". This is the world my children will live in.

You could just take it up with your local municipality it isn't exactly sweeping across the country and it's just a proposal.
 
You could just take it up with your local municipality it isn't exactly sweeping across the country and it's just a proposal.

So i'm assuming you believe that the attempt in NYC to ban large sodas is not exactly a sweeping issue but just their problem, which will not spillover in anyway to other municipalities?
 
So i'm assuming you believe that the attempt in NYC to ban large sodas is not exactly a sweeping issue but just their problem, which will not spillover in anyway to other municipalities?

So far yes it seems so every municipality has stuff that doesn't really make sense. If it happened in a small town no one would care. NYC city has soda bans and small towns have incredibly stupid building codes and permits.
 
What does this have to do with political correctness in any way. I didn't know this was about offending gardens.
It is about offending people's personal rights and freedoms - which is exactly the MO of the PCLL (politically correct looney left, in case you weren't aware). It has become so bad that even the RRR (self Righteous Religious Right) has started to play as well.

We could save a few thousand forests of trees if we would stop printing laws to restrict what I say, what I do, what I grow, etc. Government needs to return to governing, not interefering - unless public safety is at risk.
 
It is about offending people's personal rights and freedoms - which is exactly the MO of the PCLL (politically correct looney left, in case you weren't aware). It has become so bad that even the RRR (self Righteous Religious Right) has started to play as well.

We could save a few thousand forests of trees if we would stop printing laws to restrict what I say, what I do, what I grow, etc. Government needs to return to governing, not interefering - unless public safety is at risk.

You generally agree to whatever bylaws a town may have by living there if, if they bother you that much don't live there. Though municipalities do have a way of creating incredibly arbitrary and stupid bylaws especially in building codes.
 
There are neighborhoods where they ban hanging out your laundry. These are usually upper crust left wing hoods in California that demand we use less fossil fuel but then freak when people dry laundry with the sun instead of an electric or gas dryer. They also ban pickup trucks unless its your gardener and this garden hater lady probably is in this category, gardens look so rural "dahling". :lol:
 
A neighbor of a friend of mine proposed this to her city council. She wanted people to have to get a permit to grow a garden in their own yard. In order to get the permit, your immediate neighbors would have to sign off on it.

Absolutely not.

I also support taking vacant land in urban areas and turning them into community farming gardens operated by schools and non-profits until the owners do something with it. Eliminates an eyesore, educated kids on farming, use the food grown to feed the poor and sell to generate money for non-profit causes.
 
You mention one of the most laughable of ALL situations: Kalifornication. While all of these PCLL dipsticks tart up their neighbourhood with all of the trappings of their eco-political consciousness, it never occurs to them that they are wasting vast quantities of resources to LOOK like they "care" while living a two hour daily commute away from the source of money they must have to pay for all of that environmental and social consciousness. Thanks for the chuckle of the day.

BTW: Smeagol's post #23, THAT is a great idea (and one that some cities have embraced, I might add).
 
Last edited:
Absolutely not.

I also support taking vacant land in urban areas and turning them into community farming gardens operated by schools and non-profits until the owners do something with it. Eliminates an eyesore, educated kids on farming, use the food grown to feed the poor and sell to generate money for non-profit causes.

Theres a spot here in Ft.Wayne set up that way.
It's neat to see people out there working as you drive by!
 
Back
Top Bottom