I oppose SSM but could accept no government recognized marriage as a compromise.
I support SSM but could accept no government reconized marriage as a compromise
I oppose SSM It's a function of government to recognize legitimate marriages. No compromise.
I support SSM. It's a function of government to recognize legitimate marriages. No compromise.
Last edited by Henrin; 03-28-13 at 06:44 PM.
Moderator's Warning: Cephus and Henrin - knock it off!
Welfare (Food Stamps, WIC, etc...) are not entitlements. They are taxpayer funded handouts and shouldn't be called entitlements at all. Social Security and Veteran's benefits are 'Entitlements' because the people receiving them are entitled to them. They were earned and paid for by the recipients.
Cardinal, guessing by the lack of your ability to comprehend text, I will have to clarify my statements. No where in my posts does it say that I believe that SSM couples will be the root of our extinction. It will be the root of the eventual (if ever; this statement is being made based of the assumption that you rare born gay or lesbian") extinction of this gay gene or whatever it is, don't know don't really care. The only reason I'm on this thread is because of a specific post that was made a couple of days ago.
And my "biological argument" in fact does not fail. It might "fail" to you because you obviously like to cherry-pick around details, picking out things you think are right instead of taking facts as a whole.
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.
1. Homosexuals can reproduce. Same sex people people cannot reproduce with each other, but they can reproduce. Of course I could go into things like in vitro fertilization and adoption, but they would still be moot to whether homosexuals can be married because neither having children nor the means for having children is a consideration for allowing heterosexuals to marry.
2. Homosexuals do not require homosexual parents, therefore they cannot breed themselves out of existence.
There is nothing about your biological argument that doesn't fail.