I oppose SSM but could accept no government recognized marriage as a compromise.
I support SSM but could accept no government reconized marriage as a compromise
I oppose SSM It's a function of government to recognize legitimate marriages. No compromise.
I support SSM. It's a function of government to recognize legitimate marriages. No compromise.
None of the above. I support nationally recognized civil unions for any two consenting adults.
I have to wonder where Henrin lives, that he was taught and believes that any place of public accommodation can refuse service to anyone based on race, color, religion, or national origin.
I lived in Southeast Louisiana for about 20 years and I ate and drank in a lot restaurants, bars, etc. and stayed in a lot of hotels, motels. Did not see a single place that refused service to anyone based on their race, color, religion, or national origin.
Henrin is full of malarkey.
"Tolerance is giving to every other human being every right that you claim for yourself." ~ Robert Green Ingersoll
Last edited by shrubnose; 03-28-13 at 03:01 PM. Reason: Add link.