I oppose SSM but could accept no government recognized marriage as a compromise.
I support SSM but could accept no government reconized marriage as a compromise
I oppose SSM It's a function of government to recognize legitimate marriages. No compromise.
I support SSM. It's a function of government to recognize legitimate marriages. No compromise.
No pocketed violations have ever invalidated the reality that marriage is, was, and always will be between a man and a woman as husband and wife.
I mean, from your perspective, if someone illegally sneaks a cat into a dog show, it was therefore never a dog show and cats have always been allowed.
When the election is over and we open our eyes, it will sadly be too late to wonder what the hell just happened.
Are you saying that the 1964 U.S. Civil Rights Act which ended segregation and forces places of public accommodation to treat all human beings the same is a bad thing?
If not, what are you saying?
"Tolerance is giving to every other human being every right that you claim for yourself." ~ Robert Green Ingersoll
As for your final point. You are just simply dead wrong. The SCOTUS in Loving v. Virginia found that the right to marry IS a fundamental right. It just goes back to the question of whether the government has a compelling reason to discriminate regarding exclusions.
Women (Nasty or otherwise) are going to be the reason that Donald Trump is NEVER President!