- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
I could care less who is eligible for military service. I only care about those who are actually in the military (regular and reserves).
If you have no military training, then you have no business being considered part of the nation's armed forces.
The 2nd Amendment refers to the militia (today's armed forces/reserves).
If you are in the armed forces/reserves (plus cops and the like) then you should be able to buy a gun without a background check.
If not, you should not.
A falsehood is a lie. Are you accusing me of lying?
Yes or no?
If the answer is 'yes' - you better provide proof that I lied or this discussion is over.
I don't waste my time with juvenile morons who throw baseless accusations around without cause.
If you want to call me names - let's head to the Dungeon and have at it properly.
Have a nice day.
this is complete silliness. what part of the constitution gave the federal government the power to restrict citizens owning firearms?