nope you lied about my words a couple times, seems you bias has you so bland you dont even know what you are reading, you have often tried to restate what i said and failed miserably they way you apply it and you do it so illogically.
you even do it here so bad, you make stuff up in your head that you think is true and its 100% false LMAO
1.)"You did not agree with my opinions and to you that somehow makes them lies."
100% false what i called lies were lies or they were ingorance of understanding what was actually said, pick one
havinf a different OPINION has nothing to do with lies
2.) I made the claim that the terminology was incorrect and that the subject was much more complex than what is being presented by the proponents of the term "white privilege" are narrating. And from that all you can do is concentrate on whether you think that I am for or against the existence of "white privilege".
wrong again, i dont care if you think or dont think it exists because it does, you believein git or not is meaningless to me.
3.)All I tried to do was to dig deeper than the parroted conversations that exist around this subject and you just waved your arms in the air instead. Fine I get it you dont want to go in depth you only want a yes or no type of conversation. Oh well I tried....
there no deep to go when the question is does it exist, theres only one factual answer and thats yes
when you asked if thing similar exist for OTHER groups my answer was yes but that has nothign to do with the topic, so thats not "going deeper", its trying to start a new topic
So again let me know when you can disprove the facts.
Of start a new thread and you can make that thread about anything you want