- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 82,022
- Reaction score
- 19,723
- Location
- Houston, in the great state of Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Obviously not irrelevant, except maybe in your own mind, since multiple people are making the point.
Logan's Law #6: Common Sense isn't
To you maybe, it is common sense to say that you are comparing all assault weapons (pistol, rifle, shotgun) to only non-assault pistols. To others it is common sense that the way your OP is worded that you are comparing a weapon type with itself, at least in potential since assault weapons covers pistols.
Simply because you feel that you made a clear context does not mean that it is so. And obviously it is not so. I have gone back and, while maintaining that my point stands, that I have not sufficiently worded my OP as to make my point clear. Are you too proud to do the same?
That is what was implied, by the use of verbiage, you know that, you just want to dodge the question. If implication is a foreign concept to you, perhaps you should look that up.
But you are not really interested in this thread, you just want to play head games.
Little advice, in hopes to make this debate forum a debate forum instead of a remedial English class, if you don't understand the OP, don't post in the thread.