the ones under 18 should be considered child
the ones under 14 should be considered child
the ones under 21 should be coınsidered child
the ones over 14 should be allowed to marry too
the ones under 14 or 15 shouldnt be allowed to have sex if they are child
they are not child if they have physical maturity
they need both emotional and physical maturity to have sex
it depends on individual differences
l dont care
Semper Fidelis, Semper Liber.
Stolen fair and square from the Capt. Courtesey himself.I spit at lots of people through my computer screen. Not only does it "teach them a lesson" but it keeps the screen clean and shiny.
some people want to punish the others because of their own mistakes and in my opinion it is not healthy..........
not everybody has to experience bad things . we need to be rational.
Last edited by Medusa; 02-10-13 at 06:08 PM.
"Sovereignty is not given, it is taken." ATATÜRK
I have nearly the same thought on this issue as I do abortion. There are too many extenuating circumstances that can happen to have it be dictated under broad terms.
I saw an argument earlier in here that said a 16 year old is considered a consenting adult whereas a 15 year old is not, but if they have sex...the 16 year old could be labeled a sexual predator for life which is asinine.
Now, under no circumstances is a post pubescent adult ever to have sex with a pre pubescent kid. So, I think these things should be taken on a case by case manner.
Libertarian and Atheist...wow I'm a hated man.
They are NOT the same penalties. I already said that. There are different penalties according to ages of victims and perpetrators. Here, I picked this one from Connecticut because it came up first when I googled. Here are the laws:
Connecticut Law About Statutory Rape