Yes, but for a lack of professional journalism.
No, they told the truth.
Yes, for collusion to promote a false agenda.
No, they were just doing a favor to get inside access.
If they lied before, they are lying now?
This just represents Mass Media manipulation and is normal.
That contradicts your claim of "lies".In the speech, Powell said he had relied on information he received at Central Intelligence Agency briefings. He said Thursday that then-director George Tenet "believed what he was giving to me was accurate."
But, Powell said, "the intelligence system did not work well."
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"
Cicero Marcus Tullius
If you want to prove something, using bat**** insane sources is entirely the wrong way to go about it. Wrong does not mean lies, and you have shown zero evidence any one knew that they where lying. This stuff is done and over with, get over it.