- Joined
- Feb 4, 2012
- Messages
- 25,566
- Reaction score
- 36,346
- Location
- American Refugee in Europe
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
There are hardly further arguments to be made. These however are the sufficiently valid enough to not let this go ahead. History and human nature validate this claim and hence, it is the correct one.
It has nothing to do with human nature, you said it yourself, they can still do EVERYTHING with each other as if they were married, you're just against them having the actual title of being married. That is the ONLY difference. You believe the state should have a monopoly on marriage, and should divy out who can and can not be married.
There's nothing you can do to stop a group of people from living together, ****ing each other, and having kids together. So good thing you're there to make sure they don't call it a marriage.