yes ,because it is a matter of freedom and it must be legalized
it must be legalized for only men
it must be legalized for both men and women
no ,it is a kind of perversion and it has nothing to do with freedom
it is just a marginality which may harm society
it was a tradition in many ancient cultures and defending it doesnt seem so liberalal
being against it is a bigotry and l defend polygamy as an enlightened person
it is better than monogamy
l dont care
Why is it not a good bet? Look at polygamy as it is already practiced illegally. Take away the government restriction and it will become a greater problem.
Women and girls are already being coerced.
It doesn't have to be a majority of men to make it a bad thing it already is.
Because there are men who manipulate women and girls into these marriages.
Again, it doesn't have to be widespread to be bad.
China's situation is caused by a law limiting each marriage to one child. Not by polygamy.
Apples and oranges.
Why do you assume that men would have multiple wives and that women won''t have multiple husbands? A man (unless they are a superior man like me) can not satisfy 3 women but one woman cas easily satisfy 3 men while thinking about recopies for tonights diviner.
If consenting adults and no more govt benefits/support than if only one spouse, fine by me....
Probably beats serial monotony....
Oracle of Utah
Truth rings hollow in empty heads.
in my opinion marriage shouldn't be law. so any kind of marriage homosexual heterosexual polygamy or any other combination people can dream up.
Meh, I don't really care. Let them marry 100 people for all I care. Why anyone would want all of those spouses and children is a mystery to me though.
Early voting in Georgia. On the 20th of October this old Goldwater conservative voted against both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton by casting my vote for Gary Johnson. Neither Trump or Clinton belong within a million miles of the Oval Office.