yes ,because it is a matter of freedom and it must be legalized
it must be legalized for only men
it must be legalized for both men and women
no ,it is a kind of perversion and it has nothing to do with freedom
it is just a marginality which may harm society
it was a tradition in many ancient cultures and defending it doesnt seem so liberalal
being against it is a bigotry and l defend polygamy as an enlightened person
it is better than monogamy
l dont care
I'm already gearing up for Finger Vote 2014.
Just for reference, means my post was a giant steaming pile of sarcasm.
WHAT is your point? Yes, 17 is a legal of age of consent in many states for sex AND marriage. So WHAT is your point?
this is your post..
what is the fault of those people who dont live in those states ?
why dont you want it to be applied in every state ?
many girls over 18 are consent to have sex with men over 18
who are you to prevent them from having sex with them ?
according to your consent logic .))
"Sovereignty is not given, it is taken." ATATÜRK
I will assume that you are saying that 17 years old is not the age of consent in all states. While that is true, that does absolutely NOTHING to advance your argument because you wouldn't have to worry about it then. They CANNOT marry if they are not at age of consent.
But this still has nothing to do with the marriage laws we're supposed to be discussing here.
"Yes, but are you a Protestant atheist or a Catholic atheist?".- Northern Irish joke