- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,009
- Reaction score
- 33,944
- Location
- The Golden State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Re: Would you allow your son to go to camp where there were openly gay members? [W:19
From your link:
So, send the kid to camp, but leave the prenatal hormones home.
11 sounds a bit early to me, and even if it is accurate that leaves at least 7 years between infancy and hard wiring.
The American Psychological Association has been unable to reach that conclusion:
Wiki: Environment and sexual orientation
(from link, emphasis added):
The sexual orientation of the first generation of children with homosexual adoptive parents will provide strongly suggestive evidence, and I might yield to the geneticist side of the argument if over 80% of them turn out to be heterosexual.
However, I would still prefer to send my children to a camp catering to heterosexuals only.
From your link:
Environment and sexual orientation is research into possible environmental influences on the development of human sexual orientation. Some researchers distinguish environmental influences from hormonal influences,[1] while others include biological influences such as prenatal hormones as part of environmental influences.[2]
According to several studies, each older brother increases a man's odds of developing a homosexual orientation by 28%–48%. Most researchers attribute this to prenatal environmental factors, such as prenatal hormones.[17][18][19][20] McConaghy (2006) found no relationship between the strength of the effect and degree of homosexual feelings, suggesting the influence of fraternal birth order was not due to a biological, but a social process.[21]
So, send the kid to camp, but leave the prenatal hormones home.