View Poll Results: Would this compromise be acceptable?

Voters
93. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes. This isnít perfect, but no compromise is.

    12 12.90%
  • No. I donít mind some compromise, but this still takes away too much.

    13 13.98%
  • No. We should never compromise our gun rights.

    61 65.59%
  • No. This still gives too many gun ownership privileges.

    4 4.30%
  • I can hit a target 400 yards away with my eyes closed.

    3 3.23%
Page 59 of 71 FirstFirst ... 949575859606169 ... LastLast
Results 581 to 590 of 705

Thread: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

  1. #581
    On Vacation
    joko104's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 04:30 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    31,569
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

    Quote Originally Posted by Dammitboy! View Post
    Really?! Is everyone here an uneducated lazy boob? 1.6 second Google search lil feller.

    United States v. Miller - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    A one sided presentation as neither Miller nor his attorney appears for lack of money. Therefore the court took argument of the government as facts. Short, smooth bore firearms were incredible common in warfare in the USA. Basically all handguns initially were short smooth bore/barrel shotguns.

  2. #582
    global liberation

    ecofarm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Miami
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    66,445

    Re: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

    Quote Originally Posted by karpenter View Post
    He Can Pretend He's King Of Slobovia For All I Care
    Can I? I'd appreciate it if you would refer to me as such in the future. We can find a different title for him. Ok?

  3. #583
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Seen
    09-30-14 @ 01:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    70

    Re: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

    Quote Originally Posted by Boo Radley View Post
    I don't know that at all. Perhaps you have some objective evidence you can share, not one based on a fallacy.
    No, I Don't Believe You Know Anything At All.
    No Liberal Ever Does.
    It's All Osmosis, Or Something.
    Or Maybe Just The Sheer Magnatude Of Your Own Innate Intellects.
    Observe Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, Al Gore, Maxine Waters Or....
    Hell, Pick Your Fool

  4. #584
    Sage
    Boo Radley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    11-22-17 @ 04:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    36,858

    Re: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

    Quote Originally Posted by karpenter View Post
    No, I Don't Believe You Know Anything At All.
    No Liberal Ever Does.
    It's All Osmosis, Or Something.
    Or Maybe Just The Sheer Magnatude Of Your Own Innate Intellects.
    Observe Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, Al Gore, Maxine Waters Or....
    Hell, Pick Your Fool
    You are free to show some objective evidence.

    AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.

  5. #585
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Seen
    09-30-14 @ 01:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    70

    Re: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

    Quote Originally Posted by ecofarm View Post
    Can I? I'd appreciate it if you would refer to me as such in the future. We can find a different title for him. Ok?
    I'll Try Not To Tell Him What I Really Think Of Him In The Future
    But He's The One I've Met So Far
    I'll Try To Pander To The Delicate Sensibilities Of Those Of The Same Ilk (Lefties)
    As I Gently Navigate The Mine Fields Of Less Than Conservative Thought

  6. #586
    global liberation

    ecofarm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Miami
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    66,445

    Re: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

    Quote Originally Posted by karpenter View Post
    I'll Try Not To Tell Him What I Really Think Of Him In The Future
    But He's The One I've Met So Far
    I'll Try To Pander To The Delicate Sensibilities Of Those Of The Same Ilk (Lefties)
    As I Gently Navigate The Mine Fields Of Less Than Conservative Thought
    I don't care about you two. I just wanna be the King of Slobovia.

  7. #587
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last Seen
    09-30-14 @ 01:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    70

    Re: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

    Quote Originally Posted by Boo Radley View Post
    You are free to show some objective evidence.
    Show Me A Public Mass Murder That Did Not Occur In A 'Gun Free Zone'

    Besides, You Personally Would Disregard Anything I Show You
    So Why Should I Dig Back & Show How The Crime At Miami Airports Screeched To A Halt After Concealed Carry ??
    And Because Of That Success, Concealed Carry Has Spread Across The Country.

    But You Don't Know That, Or Won't Acknowledge It.
    Even Though It Has Been Reported For The Last 20yrs.

    Don't You Have Any Hobbies
    Like READING, Or Anything ??

    I Used To Read The Newspaper Every Day
    But The Price Goes Up, And Coverage Gets Thinner & Thinner.
    You Don't Check The News At All.
    You Don't Know Anything.

    Probably Why You Plaster Those Wings In Your Avatar.
    Validation, Is It ??

  8. #588
    Sage
    Boo Radley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    11-22-17 @ 04:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    36,858

    Re: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

    Quote Originally Posted by karpenter View Post
    Show Me A Public Mass Murder That Did Not Occur In A 'Gun Free Zone'

    Besides, You Personally Would Disregard Anything I Show You
    So Why Should I Dig Back & Show How The Crime At Miami Airports Screeched To A Halt After Concealed Carry ??
    And Because Of That Success, Concealed Carry Has Spread Across The Country.

    But You Don't Know That, Or Won't Acknowledge It.
    Even Though It Has Been Reported For The Last 20yrs.

    Don't You Have Any Hobbies
    Like READING, Or Anything ??

    I Used To Read The Newspaper Every Day
    But The Price Goes Up, And Coverage Gets Thinner & Thinner.
    You Don't Check The News At All.
    You Don't Know Anything.

    Probably Why You Plaster Those Wings In Your Avatar.
    Validation, Is It ??
    You're kind of all over the place. Do you have objective vide nice or not?

    AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.

  9. #589
    Professor
    zstep18's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Somewhere
    Last Seen
    02-24-14 @ 02:29 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,770

    Re: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

    Quote Originally Posted by Dammitboy! View Post
    It's been demonstrated repeatedly. Only the brain dead would have trouble seeing that.

    One more time: If the police think they need them - then I need them. We face the same criminal element.
    Sure, we face the same criminal element, but we, as citizens, do not go up against that same criminal element each and every day.

    Law enforcement seeks out that criminal element and tries to eliminate it and protect the city from it. At least that's what they're supposed to do. We, as citizens, don't take calls and purposefully put ourselves into dangerous situations in order to eliminate criminal activity.

  10. #590
    Sage
    longview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:08 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,374

    Re: A proposed compromise on "assault weapons"

    Quote Originally Posted by zstep18 View Post
    Sure, we face the same criminal element, but we, as citizens, do not go up against that same criminal element each and every day.

    Law enforcement seeks out that criminal element and tries to eliminate it and protect the city from it. At least that's what they're supposed to do. We, as citizens, don't take calls and purposefully put ourselves into dangerous situations in order to eliminate criminal activity.
    Why is it in the state's interest to restrict my ability to respond to violence should it come my way?

Page 59 of 71 FirstFirst ... 949575859606169 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •