- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Of course it is not acceptable. After all, the Second Amendment very clearly says
It is the undeniable right of every American nut job to have any freakin' firearm of any power made possible by technology for their use as long as they can get their hands on it and the peoples government and common sense be damned.
Its right there in the right wing Constitution.
so tell us Haymarket, at what number of rounds do limits violate the constitution
Especially since NYS police routinely carry 17 round handgun magazines and 30 round rifle magazines
seems to me honest people can debate whether us civilians can own military issued weapons that can be deployed by an individual soldier but are not individually issued such as SAMS or LAWS but its hard to argue that civilian defensive police weapons are outside the scope of the second