- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,325
- Reaction score
- 311
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Just ignore that part. I got ahead of myself on that one.??????
why would mass genoicide result from equal rights?
Just ignore that part. I got ahead of myself on that one.??????
why would mass genoicide result from equal rights?
Just ignore that part. I got ahead of myself on that one.
well with this one post you just proved there a whole lot you dont know about contracts or marriage.
legal marriage is in fact a legal contract.
Awesome. I'll put my JD/MBA up against yours......
At ease, soldier. Don't sprain your brain on this one. I just wanted to get the guy's idea of what bad is. The rest of that was just scrambled eggs.ahead of yourself? I dont even see how mass genocide are on the same path
anyway what "bad" do YOU think will happen from equal rights
At ease, soldier. Don't sprain your brain on this one. I just wanted to get the guy's idea of what bad is. The rest of that was just scrambled eggs.
Awesome. I'll put my JD/MBA up against yours......
I have nothing because there is nothing. It was an incomplete thought. Give your brain a rest.no brain sprain i wanted to see what your broken logic was to relate the two, but i guess you have nothing.
You mean equal rights that aren't actually rights yet? Is that what you mean? If same-sex marriage were an actual right, don't you think it would be recognized in all 50 states?now on to my question i asked you didnt answer, what "bad" do YOU think will happen from equal rights
Then you should know that marriage contains elements of contract, counsellor.
1.)I have nothing because there is nothing. It was an incomplete thought. Give your brain a rest.
You mean equal rights that aren't actually rights yet? Is that what you mean? If same-sex marriage were an actual right, don't you think it would be legal in all 50 states?
I know that there are 5 requirement for a contract to be valid and government involvement in entering into one or leaving one is not amongst those 5 elements. Marriage is a legal status. Whether or not the Courts decide to apply contract principles to them on the ending side to get to whatever equitable argument they want to make does not make them contracts. Of all the arguments for gay marriage, this one is the silliest IMHO and opens the door to all the equally silly polygamy arguments against it since contracts can have multiple parties.
Me too. Though I see you still haven't figured out how to rest your brain.1.) not only incomplete but illogical, glad you figured that out
Hey, you're a smart guy. I just want to be sure you have your ducks in a row before you go popping off. Go ahead and explain yourself, then I'll be more than happy to address your query.2.) sooooooo you are dodging it again? maybe youll ask next time ill try again, what "bad" do YOU think will happen from equal rights?
1.)Me too. Though I see you still haven't figured out how to rest your brain.
Hey, you're a smart guy. I just want to be sure you have your ducks in a row before you go popping off. Go ahead and explain yourself, then I'll be more than happy to address your query.
And yet, you still can't shut up about it. Obsess much?1.)it was never not at rest, i knew it was illogical the moment i read it, just found it weird that it was possible you didnt.
How in the world can you expect to get questions answered when you don't even have your s*** together? Answer the question, please.2.) soooo yet another dodge, weird you cant answer the simple question you wanted answered. ill try yet a third time, what "bad" do YOU think will happen from equal rights?(gay marriage)
Oh, I see, you haven't passed the bar yet:roll:
And yet, you still can't shut up about it. Obsess much?
How in the world can you expect to get questions answered when you don't even have your s*** together? Answer the question, please.
Sure I have and I have done a divorce or two and drafted hundreds of commercial contracts but if you want to show me where government permission to enter into and leave a contract between two private individuals is a required element of a contract, I will be sure to give it all the consideration it deserves.....
Old Testament outline: Leviticus 16. Leviticus 16 NIV - The Day of Atonement - The LORD spoke - Bible Gateway
New Testament unwitting fulfillment: Matthew 26 Matthew 26:1-4 NIV - The Plot Against Jesus - When Jesus had - Bible Gateway
List of High Priests of Israel - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Caiaphas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Sure I have and I have done a divorce or two and drafted hundreds of commercial contracts but if you want to show me where government permission to enter into and leave a contract between two private individuals is a required element of a contract, I will be sure to give it all the consideration it deserves.....
Sure I have and I have done a divorce or two and drafted hundreds of commercial contracts but if you want to show me where government permission to enter into and leave a contract between two private individuals is a required element of a contract, I will be sure to give it all the consideration it deserves.....
So marriage is a contract, and has long been described as a contract, but it’s a very peculiar kind of contract that has its own special legal rules. To ask whether marriage is “technically” a contract doesn’t make much sense, because it presupposes a single unique meaning for the term “contract.” If by contract you mean “a contract as typically defined at law,” which is to say a contract that has most of the legal consequences that a typical contract has, then the answer is “largely not,” because marriage contracts have such specialized legal consequences. If by contract you mean “something the law has typically labeled a contract,” the answer is “probably yes,” simply because “marriage contract” has long been a common term. If by contract you mean “a mutual agreement that the law treats as binding as a consequence of the parties’ having agreed to it,” then the answer is “yes.”
Here are some thoughts on the subject from a much more knowledgeable lawyer than you:
The Volokh Conspiracy » Is Marriage a Legal Contract?
To wit:
but if you want to show me where government permission to enter into and leave a contract between two private individuals is a required element of a contract, I will be sure to give it all the consideration it deserves.....
Funny, you cane into the conversation out of context and obviously didn't read the preceding posts, just to troll me. Had you actually read the whole thread you'd see it's precisely on point.Funny, Volokh doesn't speak to what Fisher said:
It's hilarious to me how you continually lecture people learned in their own fields when you have absolutely not one clue.
Funny, you cane into the conversation out of context and obviously didn't read the preceding posts, just to troll me. Had you actually read the whole thread you'd see it's precisely on point.
Oh wait, not funny... Typical. At this point I can't even remember what I said to you that got you so butthurt, Harsh, but you simply haven't got the discipline or argumentative chops to get the better of me. Just let it go.