repeter
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2009
- Messages
- 3,445
- Reaction score
- 682
- Location
- California
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I have read hundreds of studies. I have been at this for almost 35 years, professionally since the early 1980s. If gun bans were effective, the anti gun idiots would actually cite them
the fact that the anti gun idiots talk about ENGLAND etc proves I am right
and what you have done is google studies that support your agenda without actually studying those studies and reading the criticism of them
its like the clowns who cite the infamous Kellerman study (if you have a gun in your home you are 6x times or so forth to be shot) well guess what kellerman's study would include cases where a disarmed home was invaded by ARMED robbers who shot people-that home was called a home with a firearm (duh no guns means no shootings -but all gun laws do is disarm honest people)
then we have that idiotic study claiming few massacres are stopped by armed citizens. that is because that idiotic study only included massacres where lots of people are killed. In cases where there were armed interventionists, there were not ENOUGH innocents killed because the active shooter was whacked or taken prisoner by an armed individual
You know what, if you could show me these in the form of articles, PDFS, or something I can read, I'd be happy to take a look at them. Your "experience" isn't verifiable. So, this is what we're going to do. I'm going to wait for you to come back with something I can read, and rebut. You can either provide that. If you don't well, this "debate" is basically me talking to a wall with a sign that says, "No you're wrong! But I can't tell you why, just trust me."
You see what I'm getting at here?