- Joined
- Sep 3, 2010
- Messages
- 120,954
- Reaction score
- 28,531
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Oh really? What was the definition that we agreed to? I really don't remember EVER agreeing with you. :lol:
Herre it is for you and from you post 303 and many many many after that in which the participants agreed to use that definition
http://www.debatepolitics.com/gun-control/139998-abc-nightline-pushing-gun-issue-w-194-a-31.html
You provided the definition.
You agreed to its use.
Of course, after you came to realize that the only part that actually applied in the historical being discussed was the part you provided labeled as OBSOLETE, you tried to back pedal away from it since it did not conform to the modern NRA party line that you endorse.
But that changes nothing. It still came from you and was agreed upon my you, Federalist, myself and others as the one to use. It was Federalist who challenged me to show that the OBSOLETE definition was applicable in that time period and I then did that. And that seemed to make some folks very unhappy.
Last edited: