- Joined
- May 28, 2011
- Messages
- 13,813
- Reaction score
- 2,233
- Location
- Huntsville, AL
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Except that is not what you said. Nor is it what you implied. Your opinion is not found in any of the debates or arguments about the Bill of Rights in the states nor in any of the collected papers of any of the participants.How does you repeating the same nonsense provide substance to the same nonsense?
You asked your question. I answered it. What about that do you not comprehend?
My position is clear and unmistakable: The Second Amendment says what it says and no more and no less.
Are you of the opinion that the Framers who had just defeated a nation that had tyrannized them with a standing army would wish to see their antidote to tyranny be less capably armed than the troops that tyrannized them?
If so can you show me any evidence?
For you or anybody else to pretend to tell me or anyone else what some individuals may have believed about their personal intent is irrelevant compared to the actual language which they gave us. They would not be the first people who wrote language which later came back to bite them in the ass because they failed to write it the way they thought they intended to.
Blather. Admit that you do not know what you are talking about. And then move on.
No. It is with you and all others who facilitate tyranny as long as it comes a little bit at a time.Your problem is NOT with me. Your problem is with the language of the Second Amendment and it DOES NOT say what you want it to say.