people will still be husband and wife if that's what they want, the form is meaningless
2.) no it is still discrimination just like minority separate but equal laws are and just like my presidential / woman example is theres no changing the fact its discrimination. As for making them match that would be VERY hard to do since legal precedence as already been set that civil unions/domestic partnerships are not equal, a waste of money and time having government doing two things that are the sae and again it doesnt address the discrimination and insulting aspects of it.
and yes SOME of them vary but there are still about 1400 many of which cant be achieved any other way.
3.) well again this simply isnt happening
4.) but where this logic fails is NOTHING is being eliminated traditional aspects of a wedding, not one singles thing ? IF that was happening id be against it myself but the fact is its not.
so bottom line is its discriminaiton plane and simple, what do you think of my example about the president and women, you didnt directly comment?