Far more people are for marriage equality than against. Moreover, the Supreme Court will certainly be able to find reasons to rule DOMA unconstitutional without any difficulty. The appeal on the ruling of Prop 8 is a trickier proposition, but I think that the logic in the argument - that you cannot give equal rights to a group of people and then take it away after they begin to exercise them - is a sound one, and it will also be upheld in the end.
yep, very aware, why do i care though its your way of trying to dodge and deflect the mistakes you made
tell me why you are against gay marriage?
Yours is the kind of post with a tone that just flames the issue...your post is the reason that I post the way I do on this issue, most posts supporting SSM or ANYTHING GAY drips of sarcasm and goes downhill from there...your post drips with self righteous indignation and demeans my opinion and makes assumptions about me based on nothing...you totally disregarded everything I said in my post to you to just spew drivel...
Lets break this down a little..
You could be apathetic...why because you want me to ? I thought I had a mind of my own and free will.
My opinion wont make a difference...I thought I had said that I believed the Supreme Court would rule in your favor
Regardless of the reasons for your opinion.."YOUR SIMPLY WRONG" Oh am I...lol
20 yrs I will be ashamed I had this position...doubtful young man or lady I will be dead.
Your last paragraph is just repetitive...
I could be apathetic...that means be against SSM and just STFU...umm no thank you.
Your opinion wont make a difference...neither does yours to me and half the country.
You are simply wrong...NO...YOU"RE WRONG...heh
If Im alive in 20 yrs..Ill do what im doing right now today and did 20 yrs prior, make my own decision based on how I read the information, not based on how you view it.
Another way to look at this is in term of sensitivity. The term marriage has been used by religion for centuries to imply the onlyhuman biological union that can procreate. This term is sacred to many, and homosexuals are not sensitive to their feelings. The feelings of the religious are being considered second rate by the PC dual standard.
Their religious did not start this name calling, with gay marriage, violatin feelings as bad as an racial slur. The hurt feelings is why there is so much angry resistance. But since their feelings count for less they have to accept the abuse or be called bigots.
Maybe the religious should hi-jack gay terms and give them meanings that create hurt in the the gay community so the gays get a feeling for the abuse they are causing. They may not be sensitive to anyone but themselves and therfore are bunch of biggots.
I was playing the devils advocate to show the dual standard that exists, with PC abusing power. I believe in free speech and therefore we all should be able to insult or be considerate of each other equally. There should not be a dual standard.
Great Post...but I would change one thing..its not only the religious that feel abused, its anyone that has an opposing view, religious or not.
I fully understand that passion involved with this issue..I understand more than I get credit for, because it never comes out on here...
We all have to understand that gays had a miserable existence for a long time..I KNOW THEY DID...they had to hide being gay out of fear of violence and ridicule...could any of us understand what in the closet really meant,I can only try...its like an Italian American having to dye his hair blonde and lose the guinney street slang, change his name from mario to Brian and tell everyone Im irish so they didnt kick his ass everyday or ...or spit on him and call him a Fin Italian scum worse tie him to a tree and beat him unmercifully or Kill him...thats what gays went through for generations, I KNOW THAT I saw it more than once.. Coming out was not only the right thing to do..they should have done it a long time ago...Now heres where I start to disagree. Even when your cause is genuinely just and being forceful when you have been kicked and treated like gays have is understandable and necessary to demand dignity and safety and rights no one can deny that..but there is a tipping point where being right in your demands, becomes trying to be dominant and dominate THOSE who dont share you view...then the role reverses and those that oppose feel they are the righteous and being besieged and they are defending themselves...the real problem is that straights dont understand all the passion and aggression behind the gay movement...and gays arent pausing and seeing how they are presenting their case now. There are so many factors that go into this it would take writing a book...
One thing I can say from the straight perspective...that calling someone a bigot and calling them haters and hateful..when they say they are against SSM just makes them more against it.
Yanno folks even when SSM becomes law..wouldnt it be nice if both sides got along after that happened.
People that are against SSM and dont hate gays..and thats almost ALL the people I talk to that dont support SSM will accept it once it happens and that includes me..so why make it so bad before it happens that less will accept it...
My last statment will be the most controversial...I truly believe that Gays and their supporters call others names..make wild insuations that they cant know are true about individuals they are far more sarcastic and abusive than the other side...and when people come off to me like that...I do the same in return when I really feel that way or not....
Perhaps our forefathers should have used another word besides "marriage" when they started giving the recognition they did to couples as legal kin with certain legal rights and then benefits. But they didn't have the foresight to see the future. But right now the word marriage means many different things, and the meaning being fought over here has no religious or personal connotations to it. It is purely a legal contract. It comes with kinship recognition (which is not a gender specific thing) because here in the US we recognize blood/family relations with certain rights/benefits and a spouse is considered the closest person to another, benefits related to mainly the fact that you have two adults who are trying to entwine their lives around each other (again, not gender specific), protections for each of them should they decide (one or both) that the relationship needs to end (not gender specific), and responsibilities/rights for making decisions, basically combining many other contracts a person may draw up to cover themselves in future situations designating a specific person to have say for these decisions.
Now, as far as the hijacking gay words thing goes, I'm just wondering how you were planning on doing that exactly. It seems pretty pointless honestly. Very few gays would get offended or their feelings hurt if you put different meanings to words that are considered "gay" words. I'm not even quite sure what a "gay word" would be.
"A woman is like a teabag, you never know how strong she is until she gets in hot water." - Eleanor Roosevelt
Keep your religion out of other people's marriages.