You logic is based on emotion, fantasy and hyperbole at times. ANd how you see it is simply not true at others.
But the point was i dont get mad at you or anybody here cause its a message board
Rings, vows etc arent needed for marriages at all and if people choose to use them again, that is thier choice and effect religion zero. Religion isnt even a factor for the topic in reality.
If your going to call me dishonest in public...you had better be willing to go digging and show where I have intentionally lied...and dont try to throw your hyperbole to try and degrade me and make you sound righteous....your opinion of what I think is worthless when its based on your dishonesty and your baseless innuendos
The hyperbole comes from those just like you who frantically jump in every reference of GAY...homosexual...Same Sex marriage with a frantic attack aimed at anyone that dares defy and disagree....people like you claim everyone else is either lieing..illogical..overly emotional..living in a fantasy world a rotten person and you and everyone who agrees with you is perfect and float over water...lmao.
Dishonesty is when you make claims that are just your opinion and try to make them the word of your god...dishonesty is when you degrade another only because they dont agree with you and attempt to demean them to make yourself look righteous and on right...that crap doesnt work with me objective..has no affect on me what so ever...I am against SSM and you cant make that out to be anything but what it is...you cant make me a liar because im against it...you cant make me a hypocrit you cant make anything but against Same Sex Marriage...lol....
This is simply semantics. When folks had trouble with miscegenation the Supreme Court stepped in on the side of civil rights. It will do that again this time. Trying to call a same-sex marriage something else will not fly with either side, and we all know it. It's an all or nothing proposition. This argument that religion ought to have a say in who gets treated equally in this nation ought to be treated like the constitutional heresy that it is.
I would also like to say that my opinion not being for SSM is not based on religion and religion is not a factor in my being against it.
When the supreme court agrees to SSM..I will not be upset, It will not bother me at all...wont affect me in any way.
I am not on a crusade or a campaign to stop SSM...Im not voting for people just because they are against SSM like some vote for only those that are for it...I dont donate to anti SSM groups nor do I belong to any. You are either for something or not..Im merely not for reasons I really dont want to go throug for the 30th time.
2.) sorry there is ZERO hyperbole in my post not am i trying to sound righteous, weird you seem upset about me "telling it like it is or i see it" when you claim you do the same
3.) dont care what you think like i said i use facts logic and reason
4.) 100% wrong since i never do this
5.) again 100% wrong since i dont do this
6.) more stuff i dont do
7.) its fine you are against i believe you have that right and would protect you right to believe its wrong, try again
8.) again never made such a claim
9.) I agree i cant MAKE you one
seems you have a lot of issues just randomly making stuff up and ranting, this post did nothing but let you vent hyperbole thats not happening, feel free to try again though
by the way, still not mad at you lol