Semper Fidelis, Semper Liber.
Stolen fair and square from the Capt. Courtesey himself.I spit at lots of people through my computer screen. Not only does it "teach them a lesson" but it keeps the screen clean and shiny.
Because of the legal costs. The environmental groups seeking a pay off legally run the cost of nuclear power up dramatically but worse is that "investors" look at the court system and figure they will lose - so they do not try. This is exactly what the left wanted. They legally made it impossible to build new nuclearly power plants. The same is nearly true of refineries - yes we are producing more oil but we still haven't built a new refinery in 30 years.
"What difference" "does it make?"
Ever see the documentary "Gasland"?
"Gasland" . NOW on PBS
I still see no problem with a "zero tolerance" liability scheme -- t'aint like they can have "just a little leak". But I'm surprised this means that building such plants is economically unfeasible.
Even so, if the private sector can't or won't, I think our government should.
Last edited by FluffyNinja; 11-20-12 at 08:57 PM.
"Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." - Dr. Carl Sagan