View Poll Results: Could secession ever be appropriate?

Voters
98. You may not vote on this poll
  • Secession could possibly be acceptable

    69 70.41%
  • Secession is never acceptable

    29 29.59%
Page 17 of 17 FirstFirst ... 7151617
Results 161 to 162 of 162

Thread: Would you oppose secession for ANY reason?

  1. #161
    Educator
    USViking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Greensboro NC USA
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    1,111

    Re: Would you oppose secession for ANY reason?

    Quote Originally Posted by DVSentinel View Post
    I wouldn't know. No one I would truly support or even that closely resembles my beliefs has ever won an election.
    Good!



    Quote Originally Posted by DVSentinel View Post
    However, if two sides are so diametrically opposed, why not allow a secession that separates the two sides before violence becomes inevitable?
    Because in the case of the United States the 21st century no good rotten secessionist bastards
    deserve to die as much as their 19th century no good rotten bastard brethren did.

    You would do well to take note of the life and life work of the greatest Texan of all, Sam Houston.
    If only they had listened to him in 1860.

  2. #162
    Anti political parties
    FreedomFromAll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    New Mexico USA
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,040

    Re: Would you oppose secession for ANY reason?

    Quote Originally Posted by DVSentinel View Post
    I never said anything about killing innocents or human beings, I said socialist and their bastardized sub-forms of Liberalism, progressivism and communism. Has nothing to do with human beings. As to innocents, I am very much against killing innocents. Children are innocents, people who have ever voted for, supported or rallied for a Liberal candidate or cause, or socialist or progressive causes are not "innocents", they are the root cause of the problem.

    The potential for bombing of a federal building to help further your cause is too low and the potential for collateral damage too high for such places to be acceptable targets. If he had targeted the Headquarters of PETA, Sierra Club, The Rainbow Coalition or even the NAACP, then the potential for legitimate targets (liberals) rises dramatically while the potential for Collateral damage falls tremendously. These organizations, unlike federal building, do not use children and daycares to shield themselves.
    Well even McVeigh realized after the fact that a better tactic would have been sniper fire.

    Before I was being a bit sarcastic about calling authorities about your possibly being a US domestic terrorist but now you seem to be showing everyone that I was in the correct ball field.

    Bombing any building in the US no matter who it is, is domestic terrorism. You just said that it would be ok to commit murder as long as no kids were killed. In fact you actually said if had targeted only Liberals that you would have been happy.

    You are not making a good argument for yourself, you do realize that dont you? I mean I implied some things about you, some bad things and you just confirmed them. Is there anything else that you would like to confess about?

Page 17 of 17 FirstFirst ... 7151617

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •