- Joined
- Sep 30, 2011
- Messages
- 4,207
- Reaction score
- 2,615
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Why is it the case that he had little to do with it? Because he was a puppet who was only doing as he was instructed? And it would have happened just the same under Gore too?
The financial crisis was the result of a great variety of complicated factors, very few of which are directly attributable to President Bush. The preeminent economists throughout the world haven't even come to a consensus on the underlying causes or how large of a role they played.
But, no doubt, you are much smarter then they, have seen through all the complexity, and have been able to trace the precise cause directly to a speech made by Bush in 2002. :roll:
Yours is a perfect example of what I'm talking about - people mistakenly attribute far too much influence on the economy to the President.