Nothing in this article counters the argument that the correct use and education of condoms use is necessary in order for them to be effective. Neither is there anything in your link to substantiate your argument that claims of condom effectiveness are "completely safe."
Are you advocating that condoms of different sizes are handed out in schools as well? Because I could get behind that if that's your concern.
The article is not about effectiveness of correct condom use. I believe the correct condom used correctly is safe against all but genital herpes - which involves skin contact, no fluid exchange. However that is a different topic.
Personally, I oppose schools handing out condoms as it is a concession (circumstantially) to illegal conduct and it simplifies complex sexuality questions.
HOWEVER, IF the school is going to do so, yes then it would have to be done correctly, which would include handing out different size condoms - with it very problematical figuring out what that is without it just getting "weird" for lack of a better word. I suppose a possible means would make condoms available at the nurses station, but a mini-talk needed. It a bit more a problem if the girl is asking for it, because in a sense it requires asking "with who?" and that answer then might be knowledge of a felony sex crime against a student plus all the gossip dangers and other issues.
There is only ONE school I've heard of with what seems a GREAT sex education program, but it is a private school for very rich kids of parents all of a like mind on sexuality - which is fairly highly promiscuous but also within piles of rules of conduct. They not only teach all kids sex education in regards to disease and pregnancy, but literally classes on how to be very skillful sexually in terms of acts of sex in real, physical ways (almost like Karma Sutra classes for which that is one of the text books), but they also have classes on correct relationship behavior and even marriage choice method and behavior in marriage, married life and parenting - that the students go thru such classes for year after year after year. A remote, usual community and with some extreme requirements and sexuality practices. However also fairly gender-role oriented too.
A couple of curious practices they have is that the keep sort of a secret sex registry in which all sex must be reported - to maintain a way to track an STD risk - the record destroyed when someone married. It strictly forbidden to ever say otherwise to anyone who had sex with (to avoid later jealousies), and - oddly - the boy/man must always pay the woman a minimal "fee"- although she may require more - to teach that "woman are neither cheap nor free." That men should realize this from the start and a woman should never allow herself to be treated as cheap. They enforce rules by being removed from their social network and even economic penalties (big ones), for any violation of any rule. But they are almost like rabbits in terms of how much sex they have and with how many people. Not until 17, but then on that birthday the kid is basically in sex-heaven, with the parents blessings too.
By the time married, almost all in that age group have had sex with everyone else - but can't say so - and they highly encourage women to be bisexual (not required) but are strongly anti-gay men being in the network. If gay then strictly limited to other gay men - an STDs control. Men are not allowed to be bisexual and remain in the network as an STDs barrier. Prostitution is an acceptable career choice within their social networking too, but only within the network. In a sense, all the girls/women are quasi so since all have to be paid for sex. Even after marriage. Sexuality within marriage rules is out of norms too, but strictly within sets of rules. They are extremely "proper behavior and conduct" sophisticated people yet also very promiscuous.
And they have done this all for well over a century.
Strange, huh?
They claim they have never had an STD in their community, straight, gay or bisexual, never an unwanted pregnancy and never a divorce. Extreme levels of sex, sexuality, sensuality and relationship school across their entire educational lives. BUT there is no differences of opinions of the parents, all who came thru the same educations themselves, with rare exceptions of outsiders allowed in - not easy to accomplish. We know a woman who did make it in.
The relevancy is that I think handing out condoms in an otherwise vacumn of sex, sexuality, sensuality and relationship education is a bad idea as all that are necessary to each other.
Back to the issue, if it could be done in the RIGHT way, sure. I just can't see realistic ways to do it given how schools function in which all students are just a number among a mass of numbers.