View Poll Results: What age?

Voters
47. You may not vote on this poll
  • 11 - 12

    6 12.77%
  • 13 - 14

    10 21.28%
  • 15 - 16

    6 12.77%
  • 17 - 18

    1 2.13%
  • Other

    3 6.38%
  • Oh, hell no!

    21 44.68%
Page 19 of 21 FirstFirst ... 91718192021 LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 204

Thread: Kids n' Kondoms

  1. #181
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,038

    Re: Kids n' Kondoms

    Quote Originally Posted by Dooble View Post
    It's clear that you advocate teen sex, and it sounds like lots of it, but do you think it's right to force tax payers to subsidize their sexual behavior? Why can't you as a parent keep your kids supplied with Trojans, instead? Also, what's your stance on pornography for teens? Do/would you green light that as well?
    Teens are going to have sex, whether you approve of it, pay them to do it, or wag your finger at them while saying 'tsk tsk'. The only way you can prevent teens from having sex is to keep an angry eunuch with them at all times. Otherwise, this is not something you can control. Your approval or disapproval has no effect, so going on about "subsidizing sexual behavior" is a waste of time.

    Your disapproval of teen sex in action: Mississippi teen pregnancy rate highest in U.S.: CDC | Reuters
    Last edited by Cardinal; 11-12-12 at 07:46 PM.

  2. #182
    Haters gon' hate
    MarineTpartier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last Seen
    01-04-16 @ 04:58 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    5,586
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: Kids n' Kondoms

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    Poor analogy.

    Not driving a car is proven to be the most effective way to prevent getting into a car accident. However, we teach our kids how to drive cars and teach them how to go about it as safely as possible.
    I disagree. Unlike sex, driving is essential to most citizen's well being. Therefore, the illustration makes perfect sense.
    As I pointed out, I'm not an opponent of safe sex being taught. I am against it being the focus of a curriculum. Abstinence is proven to be the most effective way to prevent STD's and unwanted pregnancies. Therefore, the most effective way should be taught. I also pointed to the fact that most schools only spend a semester on sex education. This is where our education system makes their mistake. Sex education should be given every year in small doses. In that system, 11-13 year olds would receive abstinence only curriculum. At age 14, safe sex is introduced as a sub-category and is taught each year until graduation from high school. We teach every year that kids shouldn't do drugs. We teach every year (now) that kids shouldn't bully. Kids are taught how to eat healthily every year. Why aren't they taught this (most?) important subject every year? Repetition, IMO, is the most effective manner of instruction when dealing with behavioral traits.
    “Mr. Speaker, I once again find myself compelled to vote against the annual budget resolution for a very simple reason: it makes government bigger.” ― Ron Paul
    Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty. – Thomas Jefferson

  3. #183
    Dungeon Master
    Veni, vidi, dormivi!

    spud_meister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Didjabringabeeralong
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    33,877
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: Kids n' Kondoms

    If you don't want your kids to have sex in high school, then limit their physical activity and get them reading Harry Potter at an early age. It's easy as that.
    So follow me into the desert
    As desperate as you are
    Where the moon is glued to a picture of heaven
    And all the little pigs have God

  4. #184
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    07-08-14 @ 06:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,325

    Re: Kids n' Kondoms

    Quote Originally Posted by roflpublican View Post
    that's code for 'let em flup like bunnies, darn the children, i don't want to pay 25 cents to prevent paying a lifetime of a teen mother's welfare with my taxes anyway'.
    What you're really saying is "Why should I pay for my kid's sex when I can get the government to do it for me?".

  5. #185
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Tampa
    Last Seen
    09-24-13 @ 11:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    1,526

    Re: Kids n' Kondoms

    Quote Originally Posted by Dooble View Post
    What you're really saying is "Why should I pay for my kid's sex when I can get the government to do it for me?".
    you'll have to pay anyway. teen moms end up on welfare at a higher rate than others. so you either pay for the condom, or you pay for the welfare. you don't have a choice other than that, unless you want to kill her and her baby and go to prison, or convince her to have an abortion.

  6. #186
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    07-08-14 @ 06:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,325

    Re: Kids n' Kondoms

    Quote Originally Posted by Cardinal View Post
    Teens are going to have sex, whether you approve of it, pay them to do it, or wag your finger at them while saying 'tsk tsk'. The only way you can prevent teens from having sex is to keep an angry eunuch with them at all times. Otherwise, this is not something you can control. Your approval or disapproval has no effect, so going on about "subsidizing sexual behavior" is a waste of time.

    Your disapproval of teen sex in action: Mississippi teen pregnancy rate highest in U.S.: CDC | Reuters
    In other words: "Shut up and get with the program, dinosaur. Uncle Sam wishes to dig a little deeper into your wallet." isn't that right, Liberal?

  7. #187
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Tampa
    Last Seen
    09-24-13 @ 11:55 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    1,526

    Re: Kids n' Kondoms

    Quote Originally Posted by Dooble View Post
    In other words: "Shut up and get with the program, dinosaur. Uncle Sam wishes to dig a little deeper into your wallet." isn't that right, Liberal?
    again, you have to pay either way. either you pay for the welfare, or the condom, or as i said kill the offending woman/baby yourself or convince her to have an abortion. ignoring reality wont make it go away. also, you keep throwing that world liberal around like an insult, perhaps you should change your lean to rush limbaugh and be a bit more honest .

  8. #188
    Almost respectable

    Cardinal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    35,038

    Re: Kids n' Kondoms

    Quote Originally Posted by Dooble View Post
    In other words: "Shut up and get with the program, dinosaur. Uncle Sam wishes to dig a little deeper into your wallet." isn't that right, Liberal?
    Yes, though as roflpublican pointed out, you're paying much more for the welfare of the mom than a few pieces of rubber.

    So you have two choices. You can:
    a) pay for condoms to be distributed to students, thus decreasing the number of teen pregnancies and std's, thus also decreasing the number of people who go on welfare, or
    b) enjoy the pride of knowing you were able to let teens know that their sex was immoral.

    Choose.

  9. #189
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    07-08-14 @ 06:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,325

    Re: Kids n' Kondoms

    Quote Originally Posted by roflpublican View Post
    you'll have to pay anyway. teen moms end up on welfare at a higher rate than others. so you either pay for the condom, or you pay for the welfare. you don't have a choice other than that, unless you want to kill her and her baby and go to prison, or convince her to have an abortion.
    I'll stick with the Welfare, and leave the condom distribution to the parents. As for the parentless, we simply assign each registered Democrat to one or two children and tap them for each kid's supply of condoms. It makes perfect sense, as Democrats have their finger on the pulse of our youth's sex lives.

  10. #190
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    01-22-17 @ 09:27 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    4,136

    Re: Kids n' Kondoms

    For everyone who might decide to click "oh hell no!" please consider the following question. Would you rather pay for a 15-16 year old's condoms, or their welfare when they have a child/their medicaid when they get AIDs?

Page 19 of 21 FirstFirst ... 91718192021 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •