- Joined
- Jul 20, 2005
- Messages
- 20,688
- Reaction score
- 7,320
- Location
- Washington, DC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
If an institution, such as a school, can claim jurisdiction over a client's life when that client is not on the institution's property, and not under that institution's supervision or control, then what jurisdiction can that institution not claim?
I just do not see any rational basis for allowing such an institution such broad authority over things that happen outside of its own territory.
That's because you are viewing the school from the perspective of a governmental entity claiming broad authority whose jurisdiction and power need to be constrained. Whereas I am just viewing it as a means to an end (i.e. educating a child in the best way that it can).