• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"47% Video" What do you think of the person that recorded i & made it public?

"47% Video" What do you think of the person that recoreded i & made it public?


  • Total voters
    20
I'm sure they were ''Well Rewarded,'' for their undercover Video, maybe they thought Romney would .......... Not Be As Flexible,
after the Election', in his reward to them',..... i'm jus sayin ??????
 
It was probably the first and last $50,000/plate dinner I will ever get to witness.
 
Nope, plenty of gay men are not fairies. Some straight men are. Whomever leaked that had no right to=apparently it was someone employed by the caterer. they had no right to do that

Well, we have a difference of opinion. I think the American people had a right to know how Mitt talked about them to his rich friends.
 
I'm sure they were ''Well Rewarded,'' for their undercover Video, maybe they thought Romney would .......... Not Be As Flexible,
after the Election', in his reward to them',..... i'm jus sayin ??????

Mitt proved to be exceptionally flexible during the entire campaign. In fact, nobody had much of a clue as to where he stood on anything - except for his contempt for 47% of the population. He was pretty clear about that.
 
Well, we have a difference of opinion. I think the American people had a right to know how Mitt talked about them to his rich friends.

so if someone bugged Obama's conversations with Valerie Jarrett and some of his inner circle you'd feel the same way?

stuff said in confidence shouldn't be leaked by the help who violated the law
 
Mitt proved to be exceptionally flexible during the entire campaign. In fact, nobody had much of a clue as to where he stood on anything - except for his contempt for 47% of the population. He was pretty clear about that.

stop fibbingg. Romney never denigrated hard work, success or America. his theme was constant on what really counted-getting America back to work
 
You can't expect to win elections when you turn people off.
 
so if someone bugged Obama's conversations with Valerie Jarrett and some of his inner circle you'd feel the same way?

stuff said in confidence shouldn't be leaked by the help who violated the law

It was hardly a private meeting with his staff. It was a fat cat fundraiser.
 
It was hardly a private meeting with his staff. It was a fat cat fundraiser.

that does not contradict what I said-it wasn't one of the invitees who illegally taped the comments
 
stop fibbingg. Romney never denigrated hard work, success or America. his theme was constant on what really counted-getting America back to work

Who's fibbing? He expressed disgust and contempt for 47% of the population - which apparently includes anybody getting money from the government for any reason. You know, like disabled veterans, old people, soldiers. No matter how you parse his words, that's what he's saying.

Mitt Romney's '47%' comments: a history - video | World news | guardian.co.uk

You know the folks who, it Mitt's words, don't take 'personal responsibility' for their actions because they're dependent on the government.
 
that does not contradict what I said-it wasn't one of the invitees who illegally taped the comments

Of course not. The invitees agree with him 100%. It was probably one of the 'lesser types' serving the food and clearing the dishes out of the way, who recorded it.
 
Who's fibbing? He expressed disgust and contempt for 47% of the population - which apparently includes anybody getting money from the government for any reason. You know, like disabled veterans, old people, soldiers. No matter how you parse his words, that's what he's saying.

Mitt Romney's '47%' comments: a history - video | World news | guardian.co.uk

You know the folks who, it Mitt's words, don't take 'personal responsibility' for their actions because they're dependent on the government.

that was the Obama faithful's SPIN on what he said. and its fairly accurate though the numbers were inflated
 
Of course not. The invitees agree with him 100%. It was probably one of the 'lesser types' serving the food and clearing the dishes out of the way, who recorded it.

yeah and that is what is disgusting.
 
I suspect whomever did that was a hysterical little fairy who was a loser pissed off at his lot in life and wanted to try to take someone down.

Odd to have such vitriol for the person who recorded it and not the one who said it. No matter what we think of him or anyone like him, if you speak and don't watch your words today, your a fool. Someone will catch it and share it.
 
Odd to have such vitriol for the person who recorded it and not the one who said it. No matter what we think of him or anyone like him, if you speak and don't watch your words today, your a fool. Someone will catch it and share it.

I don't like rats who break confidence. the guy broke the law. he had no right to do that. He's scum.
 
I don't like rats who break confidence. the guy broke the law. he had no right to do that. He's scum.

Trouble with that thinking is it allows rats to hide. But that is irrelevant, in today's world you can't do this and not be found out.
 
Trouble with that thinking is it allows rats to hide. But that is irrelevant, in today's world you can't do this and not be found out.

the guy who did that broke the law. we all know that most politicians (including Obama) say stuff to supporters they don't want out in the public. same with attorneys. I often tell people I am representing what I think of the other attorney, the judge, witnesses etc. if my secretary were to convey that publicly she would be fired and would never work in that business again.

a contract caterer's employee was way out of line doing that

you like it because it hurt Romney. but it was dishonest and the person who did it should be taken apart for doing that
 
the guy who did that broke the law. we all know that most politicians (including Obama) say stuff to supporters they don't want out in the public. same with attorneys. I often tell people I am representing what I think of the other attorney, the judge, witnesses etc. if my secretary were to convey that publicly she would be fired and would never work in that business again.

a contract caterer's employee was way out of line doing that

you like it because it hurt Romney. but it was dishonest and the person who did it should be taken apart for doing that

Irrelevant to this discussion. No matter the law, no matter what you or like, anyone who says stupid **** in public is a fool.
 
Irrelevant to this discussion. No matter the law, no matter what you or like, anyone who says stupid **** in public is a fool.

but the thread is about the leaker not Romney

fail on your part. the leaker is a scumbag =ought to be someone's prison bitch
 
but the thread is about the leaker not Romney

fail on your part. the leaker is a scumbag =ought to be someone's prison bitch

You can't talk about one absent the other. We live in a world where nothing is private. We don't have to worry about big brother. We have to worry about everyone. So he person, well, he's just one of us. You might do it against a democrat. Who knows. Bt some partisan would. He'll someone who h no party affiliation might. Something that stupid would get someone's interest. it's too god to pass on.
 
You can't talk about one absent the other. We live in a world where nothing is private. We don't have to worry about big brother. We have to worry about everyone. So he person, well, he's just one of us. You might do it against a democrat. Who knows. Bt some partisan would. He'll someone who h no party affiliation might. Something that stupid would get someone's interest. it's too god to pass on.


nice evasion-the thread was what we thought of the leaker

scumbag is my view. should be in prison or worse
 
Back
Top Bottom