• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Is the US government too big?

Is the US government too big?

  • Yes

    Votes: 39 81.3%
  • No

    Votes: 7 14.6%
  • Dunno

    Votes: 2 4.2%

  • Total voters
    48
You're not paying close attention
Try to concentrate and focus on the words and their order in the sentences you read.
Could help

Use some new words and maybe someone might pay attention. At least a broken record had a little rhythm. I tried to engage you to see if you could have a discussion and to attempt to understand your devotion to Chomsky. Your response was disappointing, smug and scatological.
 
No. Give your schtick a break.

Are you like this around people in your real life? Because if you are, you need to work on a more subtle approach to your schtick.

You tried. Unfortunately we likely are the people in the Klown Kollege.
 
Use some new words and maybe someone might pay attention. At least a broken record had a little rhythm. I tried to engage you to see if you could have a discussion and to attempt to understand your devotion to Chomsky. Your response was disappointing, smug and scatological.
You seem more concerned in worshiping the same ideals as Hitler did, so why would anything Noam says draw your attention?

why would you you take personal offense when criticism is directed at US foreign policy or its fascist corpocratic tentacles?

Perhaps you should do something about it, you do live there don't you?
 
Schtick??

Are you imposing an argumentative regime of subtlety specifically designed for me?

Interesting, I can see why some of my comments annoy you (or perhaps they morally challenge you? Nobody actually knows, because your stance is unknown)

Tell me something, why would the method of delivery or style, detract from the message or the content of any statement made in here?

So perhaps it may be useful to mount counter arguments rather than inserting trivial petty comments about delivery style.

The fact that you have resorted to this says a lot about you as a person and not me

Cheers

No. I'm saying your constant need to bring up some preprogrammed keyword is a bit annoying. Your message is, well, removed from any sort of approach by mere mortals.
 
the real question should be how much larger is the federal government than it should be?
 
No. I'm saying your constant need to bring up some preprogrammed keyword is a bit annoying. Your message is, well, removed from any sort of approach by mere mortals.

Of course it should be.

They say that an effective slave does not see the chains that bind him

What choice do the citizens of the USA have in the upcoming presidential election?

I see that The Obama fund campaign generated 181 million dollars just in the last month.

Lol

Anybody can be president in the USA

The president and congress represents YOU!

Lol
 
I think we should hold our politicians to the same rules at my job. A short bit of background...my best friend works in the same field as me. In fact, his company is a client of my company. We can still be friends, but we have to be careful what information we share with each other about our jobs/companies because there is a conflict of interest.

Our politicians can be friends with CEOs, but they should not be getting close with each other on the job. There is a conflict of interest that leads to bills created to "help out" their buddies. If I exchanged company information with my friend, I would be fired. The same should apply for our politicians. They should be fired for helping out their buddies.
 
Interesting approach - I believe that's the option Hitler preferred

You seem more concerned in worshiping the same ideals as Hitler did,


You're a Hitler. You're a Hitler! Everyone's a Hitler!! Woohooo!


Seriously, that's your argument?
 
I'd say we spend too much on the pentagon. there are other areas we could cut, and some we could expand. it's a little more complex than "too big."
In my perfect world, by far the largest segment of any government's spending would be on defensive military/intelligence projects.

But by that I don't mean it would be vastly increased, but rather that everything else would be vastly decreased or eliminated.


Of course I know that's very unlikely and possibly unworkable, but there you are. It's just that I think that the role of a government should be mainly focused on protecting its citizens from outside threats and in general leave everything else alone.
 
You're a Hitler. You're a Hitler! Everyone's a Hitler!! Woohooo!


Seriously, that's your argument?

I am not concerned with arguments and rhetorical banter

Have you ever delt with the facts concerning your Corpocratic crime syndicate?

Try it sometime - its very liberating - especially when they are true
 
I am not concerned with arguments and rhetorical banter

I can see the first part, but the second... What's calling people Hitler if not rhetoric? Propaganda?
 
I know the US government is "too big to fail" but that's not what this thread is about. ;)

So, is the US government too big, what say you?

I'd partly agree.

Some areas of government are to big and some are too small. Personally, if we shrunk the defense budget, removed various functions of law enforcement, stopped stimulus money, and increased the budget for education and environmental protection, I'd be thrilled. The government isn't too big, but it's priorities are skewed. :coffeepap
 
I am not concerned with arguments and rhetorical banter

Have you ever delt with the facts concerning your Corpocratic crime syndicate?

Try it sometime - its very liberating - especially when they are true

I saw a "cheers" by you... where do you live? UK? Aussie? NZ?
 
Australia.

You know another US puppet state

I am an American living in New Zealand. Sorry about the beating you took the other day by the All Blacks. That said, rugby sucks.
 
I do not know.
So we do have one honest man here, if nothing else.
The conservatives and liberarians will tell me that it is too big.
The liberals will tell be its not.
All these "tellers" can go to hell with their sick and not so sick agenda and lies.
 
Of course you're entirely correct

On the other hand, the truth can never be repeated enough

It seems that you tolerate lies being repeated by your corporately run media and government, but get all squirmish and uncomfortable when the truth is aired in public

I can understand that - its difficult, I realise that, but you must muster up enough personal courage and character integrity to face up to the moral monster that your Corpocracy has turned into

This is not the time to run away or bend over in front of the Corporate Tyrrant to be spiritually de-rimmed
Should this not be in the conspiracy-theory section of debate politics ??
 
Should this not be in the conspiracy-theory section of debate politics ??

It seems as though the propaganda machine is alive and well in the USA

Good is bad, black is white, up is down, right is left, freedom is slavery, democracy is Corpocracy......

Orwell would be howling in his grave
 
It seems as though the propaganda machine is alive and well in the USA

Good is bad, black is white, up is down, right is left, freedom is slavery, democracy is Corpocracy......

Orwell would be howling in his grave

Quite the assessment from a man 5,000 miles away...do you listen to our right wing talk-radio ? Or, is this possible...?
But, I am right here, and have been for nearly three quarters of a century.....you have a rich imafination....based on what ???
But, yes, in my opinion, we do have a propaganda machine...and things can be much better, but your CPs ...well, they are off the wall male bovine feces.
 
Let's just say it needs to work on its love handles and abs.
 
The problem is not with the size. It's with the purpose and effectiveness. It does seem to be corrupt and incompetent in many ways. Not much chance of that changing in this millenium.
 
The problem is not with the size. It's with the purpose and effectiveness. It does seem to be corrupt and incompetent in many ways. Not much chance of that changing in this millenium.
As I see it, the incorrect purpose and ineffectiveness are both the symptom and the reason for it's size. Kinda.
 
Back
Top Bottom