In many of these cases, you are simply wrong.
I assume, by “pro-life” you mean opposed to murdering unborn children? So far as I know, everything he has said on the subject is in favor of allowing innocent unborn children to be killed.
“Pro-gun rights”, again, everything he has ever said on the subject indicates him to be opposed to the Second Amendment and the rights affirmed therein.
That, as President, he has not had nor taken any opportunity to put forth policies on these matters is no reason to attribute to him positions that are opposite to those that he's clearly expressed.
“Very pro-tax reform (wealth redistribution) in an effort to reduce the deficit and bring about more opportunities for those within the middle-class to become entreprenuers [sic] and start small businesses to spur job growth and become prosperous…” — here, he has successfully pursued policies which have been the exact opposite of what you attribute to him. About the only thing I can give you here is your parenthetical remark about “(wealth redistribution)”, but I must point out that such “wealth redistribution” is usually understood to be about taking wealth from those who are deemed to have too much of it, and giving it to those who are deemed not to have enough; while President Obama's actual wealth-redistribution policies have consisted of taking wealth from all classes of taxpayers, and giving it to a few huge, badly-run corporations in the form of “bailouts”, which is rather contrary to the generally-understood point of “wealth redistribution”.
“…Very pro-health and health care access in order to ensure a future where this nation's citizens are healthier…” — this has been his signature cause, and to that end, he promoted and signed into law a horrendous mess which has ****ed up the entire health care business, in a manner that, for the vast majority of Americans, is making health care more expensive and unattainable than ever before.