• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Let there be light" upon skullduiggery!

DaveFagan

Iconoclast
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Messages
10,090
Reaction score
5,056
Location
wny
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Bush Deleted Intel Report Passage Saying Saddam Would Only Attack in Self-Defense

"Contrary to the mindless repetition at the time from pundits such as Sean Hannity that Congress was "looking at the same intelligence," it was not.

In the summary section called "Key Judgements" of the classified report which Bush was given, US intelligence said that Saddam Hussein would likely only support terrorist attacks on the US in self-defense, if he felt threatened. The classified National Intelligence Estimate 2002 (NEI 2002) read on page 8:"

Should something like this be illegal?
Were we duped?
Was Congress duped?
Did this cost the lives of almost 5,000 US soldiers?
Is this prosecutable?
Perhaps a million dead Iraqis, and counting?
 
I would appreciate it if a moderator could delete this version, as I screwed up and uploaded without a poll. Thank you.
 
Back
Top Bottom